• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Inverted Forks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
OK - so I see people saying "no question is a dumb question" .

so here goes : Why do I keep seeing reference to "inverted forks".
Educated guess - forks operate better upside down. If this is true - Why??
When did this become common practice? Who first tried this ? Has anyone invented a fork that operates best right side up ?

Any tidbit on this would be appreciated. Thanks Steve
 
It's about sprung versus unsprung weight.

The bottom end of the fork is unsprung (directly attached to the road), the top end is solidly attached to the frame, above the springs (sprung).

For best handling, it's best to have as much weight sprung as possible, so the heavy end of the forks should be at the top end, above the springs.

Personally, I find if I say 'sprung', 'unsprung', 'sprung', 'unsprung' a couple times, the words lose all meaning :-D
 
Steven Conlan,

Thanks for asking that question. I don't consider it dumb, in fact I've been wondering the same thing but never remembered to bring it up.
 
Pete Logan,

Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense but the sprung/unsprung weight thing hadn't even occured to me. Well done!
 
Pete Logan said:
It's about sprung versus unsprung weight.

The bottom end of the fork is unsprung (directly attached to the road), the top end is solidly attached to the frame, above the springs (sprung).

For best handling, it's best to have as much weight sprung as possible, so the heavy end of the forks should be at the top end, above the springs.

Personally, I find if I say 'sprung', 'unsprung', 'sprung', 'unsprung' a couple times, the words lose all meaning :-D
Click to expand...

While this is partly true, it is actually about stiffness. Inverted forks place the much bigger outer tube at the top, and maximum bending force occurs at the lower triple clamp. Thus, inverted forks are stiffer and offer more precise handling and a less flexy overall chassis. The lower unsprung weight is only a happy coincidence, the extra rigidity is king on motorcycles.

Mark
 
Having only ridden one bike with inverted forks ( my dads Vulcan 900) it certainly a different feeling having the suspension react that way, I mean its not really different in philosophy but the handling certainly feels different..not weird but different. Its actually alot more stable seemingly. I guess that would be due to the unsprung vs sprung...seems to come up at you more than the bike diving to meet it...
 
Tis actually due to both reasons mentioned above. Lower unsprung weight,and the upper tube could then be extended to further increase stiffness.

Dink
 
Dink said:
Tis actually due to both reasons mentioned above. Lower unsprung weight,and the upper tube could then be extended to further increase stiffness.

Dink
Click to expand...
Yup, aluminum is lighter than steel.
 
So this is why people put GSXR front-ends on their GS I'm assuming. My Monster has inverted forks and it feels completely different from a handling and simple steering standpoint. I had to get used to how the GS felt ~

JM
 
Last edited:
the_journeyman said:
So this is why people put GSXR front-ends on their GS I'm assuming. My Monster has inverted forks and it feels completely different from a handling and simple steering standpoint. I had to get used to how the GS felt ~

JM
Click to expand...

People put GSXR front ends on their GS bikes because they're lighter, much stiffer, have much better brakes, and let you run an aluminum front wheel with a radial tire.

Your Monster feels different because it has a much more aggressive steering geometry than the stock GS. A GS can be made to handle like a newer sportbike by revising its steering geometry. By raising the rear, I was able to steepen the rake on the 1000 from 30 degrees stock to 24.5 revised. 24.5 is comparable to a FZ1, for comparision a GSXR 1000/750 or R1/R6 are in the high 23 degree range. It turns much much faster now. Also gone is ANY fork flex, and modern GSXR brakes work much better than the old GS front brakes.
 
Last edited:
Newer bikes have stiffer frames as well which allows the designers to run steep head angles without loss of stability when loaded in a corner.

Regarding the topic in general, there have been significant improvements in suspension technology since the day of our GS bikes. Just about any fork from 1990 onward will put our small diameter GS forks to shame - up side down, right side up, or any which way.
 
Thanks

Thanks

Thanks for all the answers - Its starting to make sense. I have only owned a handful of bikes. Only 2 for any mentionable time. A 1967 Norton P-11 (650cc "scrambler") a bike aimed at on and off road rally's. Owned that for 10 years. And 12 yrs ago the newest bike I have ever owned, a 1985 GS 1150. I have road other newer bikes. My nephew always has to have the latest and greatest. So I have ridden a couple of Ninjas and a couple of V-Max's (now thats a quick bike). The 85 has wet my whistle for something newer. Maybe something built aroung 1999. The short rides I have done on some newer bikes really impress me with thier agility. Trouble --- you start to think that you could manuever out of almost any situation. Yea - just like when I was 20 and bulletproof. I have been looking but I am at an impass. When I see a potential buy - my wife says "so how much are you gonna sell the 85 for". SELL - what is she crazy. Who ever said anything about sell. Well so far, thats as far as we can get in the conversation. Again thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top