You ready to park your GS?

[Vrian_Sinth]

Luckily where I'm at many gas stations offer ethanol free, which is all I use now.

[Vrian_Sinth]

But if you do consider harvesting energy...

I've read that it takes a shyte load of energy to turn some corn into 'gas'.

You would be correct. You have to plant it (carbon), you have to fertilize it (carbon), you have to harvest it (carbon), you have to transport it (carbon) you have to process it (carbon) and then you have to deliver it (carbon).

The only reason ethanol is really a thing (in the United States) is because of government subsidised corn farmers. Ethanol also has less energy per gallon than the real thing, which means worse gas mileage.

[Rob S.]

Everything in every gas station around here is 10% ethanol. There's a marina down the block which used to have gas pumps. Used to.

A guy I ran into today told me I could buy marine (ethanol free) gas in the Bronx. Not that far, but it's $10 each way over the bridge.

What's the recommended treatment? A full (small) bottle of treatment for each tank full?

[bobgroger]

Everything in every gas station around here is 10% ethanol. There's a marina down the block which used to have gas pumps. Used to.

A guy I ran into today told me I could buy marine (ethanol free) gas in the Bronx. Not that far, but it's $10 each way over the bridge.

What's the recommended treatment? A full (small) bottle of treatment for each tank full?

Ride every day if possible. Sitting is when it absorbs water from condensation, and corrosion starts soon after. If you keep the gas flowing through it stays fresher. I use Sta-bil 360 at 50% more than the recommended dose in every tank and it seems to help. Pretty cheap in the quart size on Amazon. And draining the tank and carbs for the winter nap can't be a bad idea

[Griffin]

re: hating the epa, this is a trump policy, as a salve to big ag for the tariff situation. the environmental protection folks are against it. Don't want to drag it into vortex territory, just stating the facts....

E15 was approved (with some limitations on where and when) by the Obama-era EPA in 2011. The Trump administration is proposing easing some of the regulations on where and when it can be sold.

Here are the actual facts:

http://fortune.com/2018/10/11/ethanol-gas-e15-trump/

Nowhere in the article is the word "mandated" used. Congress must change the law before the policy can come into effect.


Misinformation gets halfway around the track before the truth leaves the starting gate.

[earlfor]

Since 1997, other than times I have been on a trip and have had no choice, I have not put ethanol gas in a bike.

[Spyder]

We have a gas station chain around here that sells what they call "Regular 88" for 2001 and newer vehicles... don't really know why they call it 88, as it is 15% ethanol... I ran it in my 2002 BMW for about a year, and I am convinced it did some "slow" damage. I won't run it in anything anymore. I will say, that my car did run very well, and smooth on it... I don't believe this will become our only fuel choice. Would cost both the public, and the government way too much money...

[wymple]

Oh, what a bunch of drama queens. I've run nothing but ethanol in everything for decades without issue. Clear back to my 82 GS1100 in the 80's, to my current GS850, and my 84 Cal2 and 84 650C Guzzis. Throw in 2 Viragos, a Kaw 440 twin, a Yamaha 550 Maxim, and more. Hasn't hurt a darn thing. I grew up on cars & stuff from the 50's and 60's and rotten fuel lines & failing pump diaphragms were common as cat crap, way more so than now. My old 2 stroke dirt and street bikes were fuel line problematic in the late 60's. Ethanol has been blamed for every breakdown possible since it's debut, as if this stuff never happened before. The only caveat I see is that I don't let it sit for 4 months at a time.

[mattd1205]

We have a gas station chain around here that sells what they call "Regular 88" for 2001 and newer vehicles... don't really know why they call it 88, as it is 15% ethanol... I ran it in my 2002 BMW for about a year, and I am convinced it did some "slow" damage. I won't run it in anything anymore. I will say, that my car did run very well, and smooth on it... I don't believe this will become our only fuel choice. Would cost both the public, and the government way too much money...

its 88 octane as opposed to the 87 octane regular E10 that’s available nationwide.

[bwringer]

Oh, what a bunch of drama queens. I've run nothing but ethanol in everything for decades without issue. Clear back to my 82 GS1100 in the 80's, to my current GS850, and my 84 Cal2 and 84 650C Guzzis. Throw in 2 Viragos, a Kaw 440 twin, a Yamaha 550 Maxim, and more. Hasn't hurt a darn thing. I grew up on cars & stuff from the 50's and 60's and rotten fuel lines & failing pump diaphragms were common as cat crap, way more so than now. My old 2 stroke dirt and street bikes were fuel line problematic in the late 60's. Ethanol has been blamed for every breakdown possible since it's debut, as if this stuff never happened before. The only caveat I see is that I don't let it sit for 4 months at a time.

Thanks! That's pretty much the slightly impolite version of what I was going to post. Fuel systems have been failing since the beginning of internal combustion but somehow ethanol gets every bit of the blame for every failure now. Our fathers and grandfathers had to clean corrosion and nasty green gas out of neglected carburetors just as much or more than we did.

Hysteria does no good here. The facts are bad enough.

Yes, E15 is a Very Bad Thing for many reasons, and yes, one of those reasons is that fuel systems are designed around E10 and increasing the percentage of alcohol will damage many materials.

Another reason is that it's abysmally stupid to dilute gasoline with ethanol, and increasing the percentage is 1.5x as stupid. Growing food crops to generate ethanol is beyond insane (and subsidizing this production is doubling down on the insanity). And spending the energy to harvest and process the raw materials is a net negative, which is even more insaner.

That said, I'm not blind to the benefits; it is true that oxygenating fuel can be a good thing for minimizing NOx emissions, and ethanol is about the cheapest way to get there. It's a complex topic and it's hard to tell whether the improvement in other kinds of emissions is worth the cost in other ways, or the increase in net carbon emissions when you consider all the diesel and other fuels involved in growing, harvesting, and processing.

There are places where ethanol fuels can make sense; in Brazil, they use waste products (leftover sugar cane) rather than food crops to make ethanol fuel for vehicles designed to use it, and the climate is generally warm enough they skip many of the issues we'd have with increased ethanol use in most of the US.



Anyway, back to the GS world: ride the damn thing at least every month or so and you'll never have a problem, ethanol or no. Let it sit for months, and you'll have all sorts of problems, ethanol or no. And it's simply not realistic to expect 40 year old rubber and plastic to hold up to gasoline with or without ethanol.

If you need an excuse to ride, sure, blame it on E10. If your carbs get all mucked up, the blame is squarely on neglect, not ethanol.

I haven't seen the inside of my GS850's carbs in at least 10 years. I ride it a lot, and if I can't, I drain the carbs. Regular exercise has also kept the gas tank pristine inside.

[Gorminrider]

Hah ha,wymple! yeah-I've never worried.

BUT,per Brazil there's always a catch..apart from less mileage per volume , there's maybe some nasty air pollution consequences:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel#Air_pollution

Still, it might be possible to convert our engines to solely alcohol, if it came to it..our engines are at least fairly high compression and maybe could tootle along with just some bigger jets ...it'd make one heck of a thread figuring out what's best!

[Vrian_Sinth]

Oh, what a bunch of drama queens. I've run nothing but ethanol in everything for decades without issue. Clear back to my 82 GS1100 in the 80's, to my current GS850, and my 84 Cal2 and 84 650C Guzzis. Throw in 2 Viragos, a Kaw 440 twin, a Yamaha 550 Maxim, and more. Hasn't hurt a darn thing. I grew up on cars & stuff from the 50's and 60's and rotten fuel lines & failing pump diaphragms were common as cat crap, way more so than now. My old 2 stroke dirt and street bikes were fuel line problematic in the late 60's. Ethanol has been blamed for every breakdown possible since it's debut, as if this stuff never happened before. The only caveat I see is that I don't let it sit for 4 months at a time.

Ethanol is fine if you don't let your bike sit. I did and had to do a carb rebuild. Cleaned out all the corn goop. And for 15 to 20 cents more a gallon, I don't mind using Ethanol free.

[BigD_83]

I use a chemical abbreviated as DMP (dimethoxypropane) in the lab. DMP and water become acetone, which may or may not be great in terms of combustion, but at least there wouldn't be water sitting in the tank. Below is an abstract from a paper looking at acetone-gasoline combustion:

In this study, new blended fuels were formed by adding 3–10 vol. % of acetone into a regular gasoline. According to the best of the author's knowledge, it is the first time that the influence of acetone blends has been studied in a gasoline-fueled engine. The blended fuels were tested for their energy efficiencies and pollutant emissions using SI (spark-ignition) engine with single-cylinder and 4-stroke. Experimental results showed that the AC3 (3 vol.% acetone + 97 vol.% gasoline) blended fuel has an advantage over the neat gasoline in exhaust gases temperature, in-cylinder pressure, brakepower, torque and volumetric efficiency by about 0.8%, 2.3%, 1.3%, 0.45% and 0.9%, respectively. As the acetone content increases in the blends, as the engine performance improved where the best performance obtained in this study at the blended fuel of AC10. In particular, exhaust gases temperature, in-cylinder pressure, brake power, torque and volumetric efficiency increase by about 5%, 10.5%, 5.2%, 2.1% and 3.2%, respectively, compared to neat gasoline. In addition, the use of acetone with gasoline fuel reduces exhaust emissions averagely by about 43% for carbon monoxide, 32% for carbon dioxide and 33% for the unburnt hydrocarbons. The enhanced engine performance and pollutant emissions are attributed to the higher oxygen content, slight leaning effect, lower knock tendency and high flame speedsof acetone, compared to the neat gasoline. Finally the mechanism of acetone combustion in gasoline-fueled engines is proposed in this work; two main pathways for acetone combustion are highlighted; furthermore, the CO, CO2 and UHC (unburnt hydrocarbons) mechanisms of formation and oxidation are acknowledged. Such acetone mechanism is employed for further understanding acetone combustion in spark-ignition engines.

[GS1150Pilot]

I use a chemical abbreviated as DMP (dimethoxypropane) in the lab. DMP and water become acetone, which may or may not be great in terms of combustion, but at least there wouldn't be water sitting in the tank. Below is an abstract from a paper looking at acetone-gasoline combustion:

In this study, new blended fuels were formed by adding 3–10 vol. % of acetone into a regular gasoline. According to the best of the author's knowledge, it is the first time that the influence of acetone blends has been studied in a gasoline-fueled engine. The blended fuels were tested for their energy efficiencies and pollutant emissions using SI (spark-ignition) engine with single-cylinder and 4-stroke. Experimental results showed that the AC3 (3 vol.% acetone + 97 vol.% gasoline) blended fuel has an advantage over the neat gasoline in exhaust gases temperature, in-cylinder pressure, brakepower, torque and volumetric efficiency by about 0.8%, 2.3%, 1.3%, 0.45% and 0.9%, respectively. As the acetone content increases in the blends, as the engine performance improved where the best performance obtained in this study at the blended fuel of AC10. In particular, exhaust gases temperature, in-cylinder pressure, brake power, torque and volumetric efficiency increase by about 5%, 10.5%, 5.2%, 2.1% and 3.2%, respectively, compared to neat gasoline. In addition, the use of acetone with gasoline fuel reduces exhaust emissions averagely by about 43% for carbon monoxide, 32% for carbon dioxide and 33% for the unburnt hydrocarbons. The enhanced engine performance and pollutant emissions are attributed to the higher oxygen content, slight leaning effect, lower knock tendency and high flame speedsof acetone, compared to the neat gasoline. Finally the mechanism of acetone combustion in gasoline-fueled engines is proposed in this work; two main pathways for acetone combustion are highlighted; furthermore, the CO, CO2 and UHC (unburnt hydrocarbons) mechanisms of formation and oxidation are acknowledged. Such acetone mechanism is employed for further understanding acetone combustion in spark-ignition engines.

That is interesting stuff.

[Hayabuser]

100LL Avgas is available at your closest airfield. Bring a gas can and fill it up.