Now for how I got confused. It happened once I started reading other threads on here about other people with low compression after top end rebuilds. It was very common to see responses that basically said 'don't worry about compression on a rebuilt engine till it's got some miles on it'. Now most of those types of threads either didn't give their compression numbers or they were in the 50-70 range which is significantly different from my almost 0 reading but it still confused me as I though these engines needed to be around 100 psi to run.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Confused about compression after research
Collapse
X
-
Confused about compression after research
I'll start with the problem I'm having which is very low compression in 3 out of 4 cylinders after doing a top end rebuild. Yes, I did the compression test with the throttle open. Cylinders 1, 3, and, 4 had very low readings. Maybe 10 to 15 psi but my gauge doesn't start till 20. Cylinder 2 had a nice reading of 130ish though. I did a dry and wet test on the bad cylinders with no noticeable change in the reading. So that's my problem, and here's a link to my rebuild thread for more info http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...ts-of-problems.
Now for how I got confused. It happened once I started reading other threads on here about other people with low compression after top end rebuilds. It was very common to see responses that basically said 'don't worry about compression on a rebuilt engine till it's got some miles on it'. Now most of those types of threads either didn't give their compression numbers or they were in the 50-70 range which is significantly different from my almost 0 reading but it still confused me as I though these engines needed to be around 100 psi to run. -
RGM
-
Originally posted by MechMessiah View PostI'm just going to pull the top apart again. If 3 cylinders have valves that won't close/seat properly then I can't think of a way to fix that with the head still on the engine.
You say you did a top end rebuild, did you lap the valves?1978 GS 1000 (since new)
1979 GS 1000 (The Fridge, superbike replica project)
1978 GS 1000 (parts)
1981 GS 850 (anyone want a project?)
1981 GPZ 550 (backroad screamer)
1970 450 Mk IIID (THUMP!)
2007 DRz 400S
1999 ATK 490ES
1994 DR 350SES
Comment
-
MechMessiah
Originally posted by Big T View PostWell.adjusting your valve clearances comes to mind
You say you did a top end rebuild, did you lap the valves?
Comment
-
Does the engine fire? How does it sound and ride?Richard
sigpic
GS1150 EF bought Jun 2015
GS1150 ES bought Mar 2014: ES Makeover Thread AND blog: Go to the Blog
GS1100 G (2) bought Aug 2013: Road Runner Project Thread AND blog: Go to the Blog
GS1100 G (1) Dad bought new 1985 (in rebuild) see: Dad's GS1100 G Rebuild AND blog: Go to the Blog
Previously owned: Suzuki GS750 EF (Canada), Suzuki GS750 (UK)(Avatar circa 1977), Yamaha XT500, Suzuki T500, Honda XL125, Garelli 50
Join the United Kingdom (UK) Suzuki GS Facebook Group here
Comment
-
Did you check the valves for leakage after you lapped them in? Have you put new piston rings in? If you did, did you hone the bores! The compression readings are poor on 3 cylinders. Are the valves clearances set correct?
Did you check the cylinder head for warpage?The big guy up there rides a Suzuki (this I know)
1981 gs850gx
1999 RF900
past bikes. RF900
TL1000s
Hayabusa
gsx 750f x2
197cc Francis Barnett
various British nails
Comment
-
Going right outside the box here.
Might be worth having a close look at how the valves return before taking off the head. Is the return smooth all the way back up and can the buckets be moved easily when the cam comes off them at the top of the return. #2 is your comparison.
Carbs, was anything done to them. If you are going in I would try another compression test with the carbs off before removing the head.
Is the exhaust free and clear ?97 R1100R
Previous
80 GS850G, 79 Z400B, 85 R100RT, 80 Z650D, 76 CB200
Comment
-
MechMessiah
Originally posted by londonboards View PostDoes the engine fire? How does it sound and ride?
Thanks for the suggestions everyone but that wasn't why I made this post. I'm confused about comments like the one above and trying to get some clarification. I was always taught that a combustion engine needs three things to run. Spark, Fuel, and Compression. With out one the engine just won't run.
However when I was doing research about very bad compression I kept seeing people ask "Will it run/start?". Were these bad questions, people not paying attention to details of the situation? Or have I been taught wrong about compression? Can you run an engine with drastically bad compression?Last edited by Guest; 08-09-2016, 11:45 AM.
Comment
-
RGM
A leak down tester would of found that out right away.
Comment
-
MechMessiah
Originally posted by RGM View Posthttp://vmaxoutlaw.com/tech/leakdown_tester.htm
A leak down tester would of found that out right away.
Comment
-
Forum LongTimerGSResource Superstar
Past Site Supporter
Super Site Supporter- Mar 2006
- 35602
- Torrance, CA
So what is the root cause of the problem? Undertorqued head nuts or a bad gasket?Ed
To measure is to know.
Mikuni O-ring Kits For Sale...https://www.thegsresources.com/_foru...ts#post1703182
Top Newbie Mistakes thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...d.php?t=171846
Carb rebuild tutorial...https://gsarchive.bwringer.com/mtsac...d_Tutorial.pdf
KZ750E Rebuild Thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...0-Resurrection
Comment
Comment