Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Running lean on 650GD...new main jets needed?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by surviverguy View Post'83 GS650G
'83 GS550es (didn't like the colours in the 80's, but they've grown on me)
-
Originally posted by tkent02 View PostI would wait to see. With CV carbs, a bigger main jet will enrich the midrange as well, so there might not be any needle raising required.
Also a 4-1 pipe doesn't really flow more than the stock system until the engine is wide open and wound out, again it might not need any needle raising. It's easy enough to do later if needed, you don't have to remove the carbs to raise the needles or to replace main jets.
This is what I found:
As it turns out I do have adjustable needles, so to make the midrange richer I would move the clip down a notch to raise the needle, if I understand how the spring works with the needle.
It's pi$$ing rain here again and getting on dark. Not the best time to be flying around the streets of Vancouver at WOT'83 GS650G
'83 GS550es (didn't like the colours in the 80's, but they've grown on me)
Comment
-
7981GS
Correct.
Down is richer.
Or, you could add a shim under the clip where it is right now and slowly fine tune it.
Baby steps.
Eric
Comment
-
MisterCinders
Originally posted by 7981GS View PostCorrect.
Down is richer.
Or, you could add a shim under the clip where it is right now and slowly fine tune it.
Baby steps.
Eric
Comment
-
7981GS
Originally posted by MisterCinders View PostTo raise the needle, you don't shim the bottom, you thin out the spacer on top, so the spring pushes it higher. Unless your needles don't have a spring?
He would have to drop the clip and place the shim on top of it to do a half-clip type of improvement. Duh!
Eric
Comment
-
Originally posted by MisterCinders View PostTo raise the needle, you don't shim the bottom, you thin out the spacer on top, so the spring pushes it higher. Unless your needles don't have a spring?
I would have had to think about that for awhile.
You see, this is why this forum is great. Good dialogue happening right here.'83 GS650G
'83 GS550es (didn't like the colours in the 80's, but they've grown on me)
Comment
-
MisterCinders
Originally posted by 7981GS View PostRight.
He would have to drop the clip and place the shim on top of it to do a half-clip type of improvement. Duh!
Eric
Comment
-
update on the jetting
Originally posted by tkent02 View PostI haven't jetted a 650 for a pipe yet, but usually the air box makes a bigger difference than a pipe. 110 is stock, 115 might be enough with the pipe and stock air box, maybe it will take more. Careful testing and doing plug chops will tell you. Just a guess, I might buy 120s, 117.5s and 115s to start with, and try the biggest ones first.
Please post your results, I need to do this with my 650 soon as I get the pipe on there.
Z1 sells them the cheapest.
I didn't start off with the 120s as my gut told me it would be too much. I upped the mains to 115s, and retained my setup (highest idle, vacuum synch). The result was a very slight, just off idle hesitation, and a slight rise in hot-idle rpm, from ~1100 to ~1400 rpm (read off the tachometer gauge).
Last night I redid the highest idle. I thought I'd have to lean out the mixture, but I actually ended up at 2.5-3 turns for all of the screws, which was out 1/2 turn from where I had them with the 4 into 1 with the stock jets and airbox. Took it out for a spin last night and had absolutely brilliant acceleration all the way to 3/4 throttle with no hesitation.
It was too late to do plug chops, and I'm still looking for a good place to do them, but I'll keep updating as I go along.
My problem now is: the bike is running really well
What do I work on that doesn't take the bike off the road ?Last edited by BigD_83; 06-04-2012, 12:16 PM.'83 GS650G
'83 GS550es (didn't like the colours in the 80's, but they've grown on me)
Comment
-
Caferacernoc
Originally posted by tkent02 View PostI would wait to see. With CV carbs, a bigger main jet will enrich the midrange as well, so there might not be any needle raising required.
Also a 4-1 pipe doesn't really flow more than the stock system until the engine is wide open and wound out, again it might not need any needle raising. It's easy enough to do later if needed, you don't have to remove the carbs to raise the needles or to replace main jets.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caferacernoc View PostHow do you replace the main jets without removing the carbs?
I had a close look at the clearance under the carbs on my 650, and it is POSSIBLE but I did not try it. Allen head cap screws on the bowls help, and a very thin ratchet would be of tremendous assistance. You are not going to get a stubby screwdriver under the float bowls and get enough torque to turn out the float bowl screws. On the other hand, once you do get the float bowls off, accessing the main jet would be pretty straight forward.
AZR (?) says he's done it, but on bigger bikes, if I remember correctly. I'm still waiting to see pictures from people who have done it successfully.'83 GS650G
'83 GS550es (didn't like the colours in the 80's, but they've grown on me)
Comment
-
d_sal
I've been following this thread in great anticipation, as I also have a 650G (82) with a 4-1 and stock airbox with vacuum sync and highest idle methods performed. I'm not sure exactly what pipe is on there, as I did not install it, the PO did.
With that said, BigD, would you say the 115's are the right main jet? Have you given the bigger sizes a shot for comparison?
I'm currently running 115's with my set up as well. My dilemma is that as a new rider I'm unsure about what kind of power to expect out of the various rpm ranges. Up to about 4.5K rpm, I get great power, but find that above this the power/throttle response starts to diminish. Seeing as how the bike red-lines at 9.5K rpm, it seems a bit early to be losing power. Are you experiencing this as well?
Again, I am still learning to ride, so plug chops are probably out of the question for another little while for me. I'm tempted to to try going up 2 sizes to the 120's just to get a feel for the difference.
-Daniel
Comment
Comment