Repairing diaphragms ??

[Guest]

Anybody successfully done it? Mine are cracked, but so far only in the rib that seats in the groove. There is one tiny pinhole in each also. Needed a bright flashlight to find it. I was thinking about a product like AquaSeal, used very, very sparingly, to fill the cracks and kinda "massage" into the pinholes. Obviously too much will create a stiff heavy spot that would flex funny and prevent proper operation.
At $144 a piece, I figure it can't hurt to at least try! Thankfully I only need 2!

[JJ]

Anybody successfully done it? Mine are cracked, but so far only in the rib that seats in the groove. There is one tiny pinhole in each also. Needed a bright flashlight to find it. I was thinking about a product like AquaSeal, used very, very sparingly, to fill the cracks and kinda "massage" into the pinholes. Obviously too much will create a stiff heavy spot that would flex funny and prevent proper operation.
At $144 a piece, I figure it can't hurt to at least try! Thankfully I only need 2!

You can try it and see, but I don't think it will help. Someone else may have tried it, and can give you better advice. Good luck!

[60ratrod]

I came across a site last year that makes new slide diaphragms. I used them on my bs34ss carbs for my kz and work really well.

http://jbmindustries.com/index.html

[Brendan W]

Nothing to lose by trying. Some guys swear by rtv and say they have repaired lots that way.

[hillsy]

I've used ThreeBond in the past and it's worked pretty well. Just need to make sure you use it sparingly.

[JTGS850GL]

Let me know if you need replacement diaphragms with slides. I have a few extra cleaned and ready for use.

[Gorminrider]

That sounds fixable..I'd be trying the rtv silicone too. ..lots of washing the areas with water and dried first..goes without saying it'd be on the top side so it won't peel off and get sucked into the engine

[chuck hahn]

Pinhole is one thing..a tear of any length is totally another. RTV will probably work temporarily but for an actual tear I would look for replacements. The more gunk you load up ( I would think anyway ) would have an adverse effect on the diaprams inverting as the throttle is applied.

[John Park]

That sounds fixable..I'd be trying the rtv silicone too. ..lots of washing the areas with water and dried first..goes without saying it'd be on the top side so it won't peel off and get sucked into the engine

Isn't it the other way round? The upper side is vented to the venturi and underside is atmospheric? That's why the vacuum raises the slide….???

Actually, considering that the rtv would have to go through the little vent hole at the slide bottom, the size would have to be pretty small [unless it's been dynojetted ;-)] and I'm sure a mighty GS motor could eat that for breakfast without a hiccup.

I'd think coating both sides would be more durable. Then again, if it's cracking in one place the rest is inevitably on it's way. A hard spot just stresses the area next to it more. I've never had the problem but maybe it's just luck or the dry, ozone free desert air.

[chuck hahn]

No...the air comes in under the diaprams and puffs them up to raise the slides. Theres a port to let air escape or be drawn in from above much like VM slides have the air hole to allow air to pass from one side to the other.

[JTGS850GL]

No...the air comes in under the diaprams and puffs them up to raise the slides. Theres a port to let air escape or be drawn in from above much like VM slides have the air hole to allow air to pass from one side to the other.

Technically the diaphragm is vacuum driven. Vacuum is produced in the venturi of the main body when the throttle plate is opened up. That vacuum is transmitted to the topside of the diaphragm through the small hole at the bottom of the slide(#7 below). The large opening at the top of the front inlet of the carb (#9 below) is vented to the underside of the diaphragm. Since the underside of the diaphragm is at atmospheric pressure (positive pressure) and the top of the diaphragm is under a vacuum (negative pressure) the diaphragm is actually sucked up against the spring pressure (#6 below) which then lifts the slide up along with the needle valve.

On a side note: If you drill the vacuum port at the bottom of the slide larger it makes the response of the slide quicker in both directions. It's one of the modifications in the stage III Dynojet kits. Here's a cutaway diagram that may help explain:

[John Park]

As I recall, the action of the slide being somewhat behind the throttle give an accelerator pump effect; the momentary increase in 'suck' pulls more fuel from the jet than air through the venturi. In the original CV carb design by SU found on many British cars there was an oil damper fitted at the top of the slide housing that controlled the rate of movement as a shock damper would.

I think that drilling out the hole is fine as long as you're willing to make the midrange jetting somewhat rich[er]. For racing it's a good idea as you get faster midrange throttle response, but for emissions and economy, the factory had it right.

A bigger hole shouldn't make the slide run higher. Shortening the spring should; that ought to make the the slide hit wide open at a lower rpm, which could be a good or bad thing.

Some wag once said that the term carburetor comes from a French intransigent verb meaning 'to leave well enough alone'.

[tkent02]

If it shouldn't make the slide run higher why would it make the midrange richer?

[Gorminrider]

Just a whine per an otherwise fine drawing- the drawing doesn't show that the slides are a tight smooth fit in their bores- which is important, I think to stop air being drawn into the engine and to keep the venturi pressure away from the "atmospheric area" (though the effect of that would be small?)... anyways, I recall some CV carbs actually scribe rings into the slider. My guess is that they would do this to ensure a more airtight fit without increasing the friction.

A bigger hole shouldn't make the slide run higher.

oh no! the compressibility of air versus orifices! I was hoping it wouldn't come down to fart jokes.

[John Park]

If it shouldn't make the slide run higher why would it make the midrange richer?

It wouldn't. However, the reduction of the slide response delay would reduce the accelerator pump effect. To compensate you may have to have to raise the needle somewhat. This is the situation that CV carbs avoid - needing to run a bit richer than they would theoretically in order to not bog or surge when you open the throttle too much, too soon. They respond to engine demand rather than rider direct input.

This is why CV carbs general give better fuel economy. They can be set on the leaner side rather than the richer side in the cruising midrange. Once the throttle is wide open and the slides are up there's no difference. It's a bit hard to find perfect examples because in many cases when they went to CV carbs they changed a pile of other stuff, but I recall bikes getting 40-45 going to 45-50 when fitted with CVs.

Running the slide higher in relationship to the butterfly should actually make the mixture leaner; that's why non CV carbed engines can bog if you open the carb wide open at too low an rpm. The airflow velocity drops at the jet; you're flowing lots of air, but it isn't speeding up so much in the venturi. That's the whole plot of a CV carb; constant velocity at the jet mouth. It's all about midrange mixture control.