I am in the process of reworking my 1980 GS450's electrical system as per the various recommendations I've found on and around the site.
I'm going to replace the bad stock Regulator/Rectifier with a Honda Shindengen SH532-12, and I have seen it repeatedly recommended that the stator be wired as directly as possible to the R/R to reduce resistance. However, this is typically discussed in the context of post-1980 models where the headlight switch is no longer functional and the excess wire running to it and back is therefore vestigial (and, the headlight being always on, all three phases of the stator are constantly in use).
My question is this: I intend to keep the functionality of my headlight switch, but would it still be ok to wire the R/R straight to the stator and just bypass that part of the switch? I know it's possible because it's a double pole switch and I could just skip that half; what I'm wondering is whether it's advisable.
A simple yes or know will do, but if you wish to check and/or correct my technical understanding, read on.
My reason for concern is as follows:
As I understand it, one function of the headlight switch is to cut off one arm of the stator when the headlight (a major power draw) isn't functioning. So, in stead of making the R/R deal with all that extra juice when the light's off, that stator coil just has to eat up the induced voltage and (I presume) dissipate the engergy as heat. If I bypass this switch, it keeps any arm of the stator from ever being turned off (which, I imagine, is a relief for the stator), but then the R/R has to deal with that much more juice when the headlight is off. This worries me because I don't know how much the R/R can take, especially since any post-1980 R/R was probably engineered under the assumption that the headlight(s) would always be on.
Please forgive me if my understanding is crude. I've been through basic electricity twice, once in a physics class and once in aircraft mechanic training, but my insight into most electrical phenomena is still rudimentary.
Comment