Don't for get to vote in the complementary SSPB II poll.
http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...-Research-Poll
UPDATE: To be more clear about the physical form factor I added the picture above. The screw terminals on this version are fully enclosed inside the case and under cover. The wires enter through a rubber grommet in the side of the case. The ends can then be stripped and tinned to insert into the required connection. wires. The second picture down below is more functional so you see what is going in and what is coming out of the SSAB.
A quick spray of contact cleaner across the wire holders and you are good to go. Update the protection every 2-3 years and there should be no problem with corrosion. Also since it is all inside of the case you don't get any over spray on other things.
All the critical charging connections are soldered.
This is a Market research Poll for a product that is similar to the Solid State Power Box I already designed.
As many of you know last year I decided to try my hand a making a commercial product which became know as the Solid State Power Box. It is a solid state power distribution module that replaces a stock GS fuse box and adds a bit of logic to incorporate the equivalent of Ignition , headlamp and accessory relay functions. It is designed and produced to a high standard of reliability and robustness as anyone would expect and want for a replacement to something as critical as your fuse box.
There is another product currently on the market which is very similar. It retails for $199 and has a computer USB interface to customize the current settings for each of 6 channels. It has more LED indicator lights as well.
This type of device is really needed on modern motorcycles with CAN bus because those bikes can show an error if there is an extra load put on the bike that is being sensed through the standard electronics. These power distribution systems work in parallel off the battery so the CAN bus never sees them. The power distribution does not need to be solid state, but if you are going to throw a fuse box onto a $10K dual sport then what is an extra couple of hundred bucks.
Besides this flexibility PDM60, there are a couple of notable limitation/disadvantages of the design.
- one is you need a computer interface. Alot of people do not mind this, but others just want to plug and play and not have to program or communicate with a fuse box.
- If you trip a current level, you have to cycle the power on the device to get the power to come back on. The SSPB technology does not work this way. The circuitry operates extremely fast to stop current flow when there is a short and it simply restores current flow once the short goes away. There is no need to reset the fuse box.
- The current draw on the PD60 is about 50 mAmps So this is not something that you can leave plugged in for long periods of time (maximum 1-2 weeks without drawing down your battery). The current draw of the SSAB is 1/20 of that at approximately 2.5 mA.
The SSAB does not have programmable limits, but it doesn't generally need them. You can repeatedly short the output of the SSPB/AB and the device self limits and restore itself automatically subject to a maximum 10 amp limit. From what I have seen if you ever exceed the 10 amp limit the SSPB will limit cycle only allowing an average of about 1/4 of the maximum.
So at the moment I'm looking at two new designs. One is a cheaper generic version of the fuse box replacement called Solid State Power Box II. It is basically the same as the original SSPB it just has 4 instead of the previous 5 channels and uses screw terminals instead of the 10 pin Molex. This poll is for the Solid State Aux Box which is not a fuse box replacement but is a device to serve another market for power distributions functions. The SSPB II and the SSAB are very similar but still distinctly different products. The SSAB does not have a fail safe ignition circuit as it does not need one. and teh SSAB only interfaces with teh battery terminals whereas the SSPB and SSPB II connect to the R/R as well.
The SSAuxBox is a 2"x3"x1" device (excluding the mounting flange) which compares to about 1.8"x3.8"x1.5" for the original SSPB.
So please vote in the poll and provide any comments on the SSAuxBox you would like to make. Please reserve any comments on the Solid State Power Box II for that thread.
Comment