Mechanical advancer

[storm 64]

For one simple basic reason - accuracy. If you are going to refer to something that doesn't exist why shouldn't you be told it doesn't exist. The original point here was to point out that the Suzuki GS series does not use CDI and therefore the person was incorrectly using the term. It was for educational purposes so they would be able to provide the correct information and receive the correct advice for their issue. Shouldn't I be corrected if I said I had an alternator on my bike when in reality it's called a stator? Both provide the ultimate electrical ability to recharge the battery during use but our bikes don't use alternators.

I'm still lost as to why you chose to make it into the argument with everyone here that tried to point out the difference to you.

On the flip side; If someone asks you for a Kleenex and you hand them a Puffs brand it's still the same thing. ¿¿¿

[Killer2600]

For one simple basic reason - accuracy..... Shouldn't I be corrected if I said I had an alternator on my bike when in reality it's called a stator? Both provide the ultimate electrical ability to recharge the battery during use but our bikes don't use alternators.

I'm still lost as to why you chose to make it into the argument with everyone here that tried to point out the difference to you.

It'd be more helpful if when people tried to give accurate information, they had correct information to begin with.

I'm not even going to touch that charging bit. I can already see, based on this thread, how it would wind out. I'm just going to say one thing, Alternators have stators.

If you go back, I was not in a argument over the difference. I pointed out Steve was incorrect with what he thought was accurate and educational information. When you say you're trying to educate those that don't know or are confused, you do want them to have truly accurate information right? and not just whatever information you believe to be true right? With that in mind, I find that picture of the three types of ignitions utterly stupid. Someone writes KZ on top of it and that writes it in stone that a KZ can't possibly have any other ignition than whats outlined? And we old Suzuki experts are qualified to make that assertion about Kawasakis? That puzzles me when correct and accurate information is the supposed goal.

[storm 64]

I wish Posplayer was around... this would really get fun! 😃

[Gorminrider]

from a book, (http://ridersofvision.net/) by Dave "Leather"Draper, concisely:
TCI collapses an already charged coil by disconnecting it (TCI switches off briefly). These systems generally use a higher resistance type coil and
are known as an "induction" or "Kettering" ignition systems.
[note: "points" are the original Kettering system ?]
CDI sends a brief high (200+) voltage pulse to an uncharged coil which act like a transformer and multiplies it even higher. The step up is
normally around 100:1. These systems tend to use low resistance or "racing" oils.

I'm not sure about kawasaki or Yamaha but Hondalikes cdi ...There are really important differences...cdi is independent of the battery so when your stator ,regulator or battery fails , cdi still works....another might be : the author above points out that CDI can Kill!

[Nessism]

It'd be more helpful if when people tried to give accurate information, they had correct information to begin with.

I'm not even going to touch that charging bit. I can already see, based on this thread, how it would wind out. I'm just going to say one thing, Alternators have stators.

If you go back, I was not in a argument over the difference. I pointed out Steve was incorrect with what he thought was accurate and educational information. When you say you're trying to educate those that don't know or are confused, you do want them to have truly accurate information right? and not just whatever information you believe to be true right? With that in mind, I find that picture of the three types of ignitions utterly stupid. Someone writes KZ on top of it and that writes it in stone that a KZ can't possibly have any other ignition than whats outlined? And we old Suzuki experts are qualified to make that assertion about Kawasakis? That puzzles me when correct and accurate information is the supposed goal.

I can see that you won't be long for this place. Your condescending attitude won't fit in here. You have made acquisitions that other members here don't know what they are talking about but you have not provided any meaningful technical information yourself.

10 minutes spent looking at the factory Suzuki manual (free download on Basscliff's website) will explain that GS bikes use an "ignitor" not a "CDI" so it's somewhat exasperating when we get so many newbies here that haven't done any research before posting. Steve, and myself, have corrected many newbies on this seemingly meaningless error, but it's something that should be corrected because it will help the person in question fix their bike.

And in case you didn't know, which clearly seems to be the case, Kawasaki KZ bikes were built in the same era as the GS Suzuki's. I made no reference to Kawasaki bikes in general, before or past the KZ era. And just like GS bikes KZ bikes use an ignitor not a CDI.

[Killer2600]

I can see that you won't be long for this place...

I think you're right. I try to pass on good information but my join date and "Forum Newbie" apparently means I'm a dimwit and can't possibly know something you don't know. The ignorance is to such a degree that you still have not read the entirety of my posts. Why should you, knowledge is obtained by having an older join date and not through actual learning here. So I apologize to everyone entirely for spreading false science instead of repeating true religious belief. That schematic that Steve showed is in fact NOT a CDI ignition of ANY sort. It's just a plain old igniter just like our GS because it's not possible for it to be any other way.

I just feel sorry for the newer members that come here seeking good information; not because there is no good information to be found here, but because it's apparent no one cares if the information they pass on is actually good.

[cowboyup3371]

Actually many new members who come here WITH AN OPEN MIND and don't try to be an arse recognize what we tell them is the truth based on how they see things work afterwards. I don't know how many times we see folks say, "you guys were right and i only wish I had listened the first time; it would have saved me X hours of work"

[Cipher]

Houses of the holy...................meh.
Mindless pedantry and a sense of superiority on the part of the guys taking a crap of this new subscribers. He is essential correct as all the systems dump an electrical charge held by a capacitor.

Childish nonsense by anyone who wants to differentiate soley on the basis of school M'armish attitude.

[phydeauxmutt]

He is essential correct as all the systems dump an electrical charge held by a capacitor.

I see we are continuing with mis-information.

CDI systems do have a capacitor that holds a charge. When triggered, it is then dumped into a low-inductance coil that steps up the voltage to 20,000+, which then gets sent to the spark plugs.

As has been mentioned many times in this thread and elsewhere on the forum, the GS ignition system does NOT use a capacitor to hold a charge. It uses a high-inductance coil, which generates a substantial magnetic field while current is going through it. When the current stops, the magnetic field collapses and the secondary windings inside the coil capture that collapsing field and convert it to the high voltage that goes to the spark plugs. Up through the 1979 model bikes, the current through the coils was controlled by mechanical points. Starting with the 1980 models, the current was controlled by a box of transistors that Suzuki called an "ignitor". Nothing fancy in there, just some transistors that switched the current on and off. No capacitors.