Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unleaded fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Unleaded fuel

    Hi all,

    I'm new to this forum and I'm well impressed with it, and this is my first post, although looking at the machine in the garage, I somehow doubt it'll be the last.
    Anyway to the chase I've just bought an old GSX 1100 ES to restore, cracking bike, I had one a long time ago with fond memories, so when I spotted this one, logic went out the window and I'd bought it before really thinking it through. So there we have it, I'm a bike owner again, happy days, never liked logic that much anyway..........it's all too easy to talk yourself out of things that you enjoy.

    Then reality dawns, it's been a while since I've had a bike, so I've a question for you technical types. When I owned my original there was still leaded petrol around, that's no longer the case, well not here in Europe at least. Therefore the question is is, can the GSX motor survive the unleaded 98/95 fuel, it's as bulletproof as the hills so I have no real doubts that it will, but are the valve seats up to the extra heat, and what adjustments to the carburation and ignition are required.

    I've ordered the Haynes manual, but I'm just too impatient to wait for it to arrive, so I thought I'd use this opportunity to join the forum.

    Thanks for your assistance, and I'm looking forward to getting the old girl running in fine fettle again, though it might be awhile, time permitting.

    Regards
    David

    #2
    Welcome to the GSR David! I have been hanging around here since April and as far as I know, Everyone Runs Unleaded Gas with no problems. I have noticed that My 850 runs best on the Mid Grade 89 Octane.
    sigpic2002 KLR650 Ugly but fun!
    2001 KLR650 too pretty to get dirty

    Life is a balancing act, enjoy every day, "later" will come sooner than you think. Denying yourself joy now betting you will have health and money to enjoy life later is a bad bet.

    Where I've been Riding


    Comment


      #3
      I RUN 93 OCTANE IN MY 79 GS750. MY BIKE RUNS BETTER THE HIGHER THE OCTANE. I RUN 93 IN EVERYTHING, MOTORCYCLE, TRUCK, MOPED, LAWNMOWER. ONCE AND I WHILE I GO TO THIS BP STATION A FEW MILES AWAY THAT HAS 110 LEADED OCTANE. BIKE RUNS WITH SO MUCH POWER AND SO SMOOTH. I WOULD LIKE TO PUT IT IN ALL THE TIME BUT ITS $6.00 A GALLON WHEREAS 93 UNLEADED IS ABOUT $2.87 A GALLON. THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM RUNNING UNLEADED.

      Comment


        #4
        You do realize that there is absolutely no more energy content in high octane fuel than standard 87, correct? If the engine pings with a given rating it makes sense to increase as necessary (as well as determine the cause, if you're having to use fuel above the official requirement). It is categorically NOT a power adder, though. The reason high octane fuels are typically required with more performance oriented engines is because of dynamic compression.

        Comment


          #5
          hello David and welcome to the forums.
          all GS's come from the factory with hardened valve seats for use with unleaded fuel.

          Comment


            #6
            The Suzuki factory manual for my 1980 GS1100E (GSX1100E in Europe) recommends 89 octane unleaded only.

            There is no benefit or performance to be gained from higher octane with a stock engine that is not pinging (pre-ignition). Using aviation-type gasoline is a waste of money.

            The use of leaded gas will created combustion chamber deposits and drastically shorten spark plug life .

            Comment


              #7
              If you see improved power with higher grade fuel, your bike is having other issues. Most likely, it's running to lean and you're actually getting the begining of detonation.

              According to my manual, 85-93 ocatne is what's reccomended. ;-) gotta love low compression air cooled motors. As for your ES... Midgrade unleaded is probally just fnie for ya. I wouldn't seccond guess the manual.
              You'd have to be crazy to be sane in this world -Nero
              If you love it, let it go. If it comes back....... You probably highsided.
              1980 GS550E (I swear it's a 550...)
              1982 GS650E (really, it's a 650)
              1983 GS550ES (42mpg again)
              1996 Yamaha WR250 (No, it's not a 4 stroke.)
              1971 Yamaha LT2 (9 horsepower of FURY.)

              Comment


                #8
                The manual for my 82 1100 shows that you should use 85-95 pump octane using the R+M/2 method or 89 or higher octane rated by the Research method.
                I ususally run 87 octane in my bike with no problems. I sometimes treat it to 89 when I'm feeling generous, but I couldn't tell you of any power difference. It's really only going to help with pre detonation.
                1982 GS1100GLZ Sold but still loved
                2008 Bandit 1250 Crashed (cager on a cell phone)
                2008 Bandit 1250 #2

                Comment


                  #9
                  I stick with mid grade gas for the bike, and avoid older stations that may have contaminated fuel storage. also avoid stations that have just had fuel dropped too as it mixes up any crud on the bottom of their tanks.

                  my bike runs just fine on 87-89 octane fuel, and thats fine with me, as gas prices are high enough I dont wanna haveta spend the money

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by fastpakr
                    You do realize that there is absolutely no more energy content in high octane fuel than standard 87, correct? If the engine pings with a given rating it makes sense to increase as necessary (as well as determine the cause, if you're having to use fuel above the official requirement). It is categorically NOT a power adder, though. The reason high octane fuels are typically required with more performance oriented engines is because of dynamic compression.
                    I'm not trying to start a fight here, but I have used 110 octane in my atv. And have had a lot of people tell me that there is no advantage to running higher octane fuels. You may not be able to tell a difference between 87 and 89, but you put 110 octane in and there is a performance difference. The bike runs noticably different(a stock bike). So you tried 110 octane and didn't notice a difference of how your bike ran with. Or are you just going by what the know it alls say. Because there is a difference when I use it. Regardless of what people say, it is a performance boost and it runs cooler!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Well, reading through his first post, you will see that IN EUROPE they rate gasoline with a RON value. So his 95 is about a 90 octane value, 92 is about 87, and 98 would be our supreme or 92/93.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by toymechanic.
                        I'm not trying to start a fight here, but I have used 110 octane in my atv. And have had a lot of people tell me that there is no advantage to running higher octane fuels. You may not be able to tell a difference between 87 and 89, but you put 110 octane in and there is a performance difference. The bike runs noticably different(a stock bike). So you tried 110 octane and didn't notice a difference of how your bike ran with. Or are you just going by what the know it alls say. Because there is a difference when I use it. Regardless of what people say, it is a performance boost and it runs cooler!
                        Also keep in mind most extremely high octane fuels are frequently oxygennated. And that WILL give you a horsepower benifit.
                        You'd have to be crazy to be sane in this world -Nero
                        If you love it, let it go. If it comes back....... You probably highsided.
                        1980 GS550E (I swear it's a 550...)
                        1982 GS650E (really, it's a 650)
                        1983 GS550ES (42mpg again)
                        1996 Yamaha WR250 (No, it's not a 4 stroke.)
                        1971 Yamaha LT2 (9 horsepower of FURY.)

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by toymechanic.
                          Originally posted by fastpakr
                          You do realize that there is absolutely no more energy content in high octane fuel than standard 87, correct? If the engine pings with a given rating it makes sense to increase as necessary (as well as determine the cause, if you're having to use fuel above the official requirement). It is categorically NOT a power adder, though. The reason high octane fuels are typically required with more performance oriented engines is because of dynamic compression.
                          I'm not trying to start a fight here, but I have used 110 octane in my atv. And have had a lot of people tell me that there is no advantage to running higher octane fuels. You may not be able to tell a difference between 87 and 89, but you put 110 octane in and there is a performance difference. The bike runs noticably different(a stock bike). So you tried 110 octane and didn't notice a difference of how your bike ran with. Or are you just going by what the know it alls say. Because there is a difference when I use it. Regardless of what people say, it is a performance boost and it runs cooler!



                          I USE 110 ONCE AND I WHILE AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE IN POWER THAN RUNNING 93. MY BIKE WOULD KEEP PULLING WHEN I REV IT OUT. I HAVE USED 87 OCTANE IN MY BIKE AND IT JUST DOESN'T RUN AS NICE AS 93. THERES NOT MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE BUT CAN STILL TELL. I REALLY CAN COMPLAIN ABOUT GAS PRICES IN BETWEEN 87 AND 93. WHEN IT WOULD COST ME ABOUT $12 TO FILL MY BIKE ON 87, ITS LIKE $13 TO FILL ON 93. I MEAN THERS A DIFFERENCE WHEN IT COST $30 TO FILL IT ON 110.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Tarbash, if that really is the case then you're band-aiding a legitimate problem that needs to be fixed.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I've actually done the high octane performance test on stock engines. A stock engine actually will lose power because the burn rate of the 110 octane is not the same as the low lead. The engine runs best when you burn all of the fuel and not a portion as is the case with higher octane fuel. High compression engines create fast burn rates because of the friction created by the higher compression. That's the reason for high octane, to fight faster burn rates. Most racing type fuels are cleaner and don't have the additives that the lower lead types do. Therefore you end up with cleaner plugs and less fouling. At max spark advance (whatever factory specs may be) you want the engine to be on the edge of pinging. That is where the power is. If you don't believe me read the hipo horsepower books out there. I did the test years ago and I did go slower with the race gas.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X