The 1979 chain drive bike gets a solid 40 mpg or better, and that?s with hopped-up carbs, exhaust, and ignition, (Dynojet kit in carbs with individual K&N pods, a MAC 4 into 1 pipe, and an electronic ignition from a later-model GS).
The 1980 shaft drive bike is bone-stock, and it only gets about 30 mpg.
Both bikes are well-tuned, with batteries and R/Rs and coils output checked, new NGK plug caps, etc. Carbs on both bikes have been cleaned and float levels have been checked, etc. and both sets of carbs have been dynamically synched with a Motion Pro set of mercury gauges. The insulator colors of the spark plugs from both bikes are generally medium tan to light tan.
Both bikes run nicely with no hesitation or ?flat spots?, plenty of power, etc. There are no weird noises or wobbles or vibration or anything else detectable while riding either bike. When I put the bikes on the center stands, with transmissions in neutral, I can spin the rear wheels by hand with no unusual resistance or ?tight spots?.
Both speedometer/odometers seem accurate, as I often ride past unattended police radar trailers parked on the side of the road, which display the radar-detected vehicle speed on a big LED display sign.
So, how come the shaft drive bike gets such poor gas mileage compared to the chain drive bike? (I?ve read posts on the GSR from other guys with big bore shaftys, and they are getting around 40 mpg or better.)
Could it be something in the transmission or clutch?
Is there a diagnostic test of the drive train that doesn?t require pulling it all apart?
Thanks in advance for your responses.
Comment