Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Valve Adjustment Theory
Collapse
X
-
SDGS1100
Valve Adjustment Theory
1980 GS1100E, about 27K miles. The shop manual advises that the valve clearance range is 0.003-0.005". When I go to adjust the valves, should I set the clearance at the low end or the high end? What I am getting at is, does the clearance open up with use (so I should use 0.003" to set them) or does the clearance close up with use (which would suggest using 0.005" to set them). Thank you.Tags: None
-
Forum LongTimerGSResource Superstar
Past Site Supporter
Super Site Supporter- Mar 2006
- 35602
- Torrance, CA
Valves on the 8v engines tend to recess into the head thus the valve clearance goes down with use. Not sure about the 16v engines though but most likely they go down as well.Ed
To measure is to know.
Mikuni O-ring Kits For Sale...https://www.thegsresources.com/_foru...ts#post1703182
Top Newbie Mistakes thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...d.php?t=171846
Carb rebuild tutorial...https://gsarchive.bwringer.com/mtsac...d_Tutorial.pdf
KZ750E Rebuild Thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...0-Resurrection
-
SteveL-J
Originally posted by Nessism View PostValves on the 8v engines tend to recess into the head thus the valve clearance goes down with use. Not sure about the 16v engines though but most likely they go down as well.
You could be right, when I checked mine (83 GS1100ED), for the first time since buying the bike, all valves were real tight -less than half the correct low end-. Either they were incorrectly adjusted prior to purchase (about 5000 miles ago) or the clearances went down.
I chose to set them at the mid point of the range.
Comment
-
Mark M
Originally posted by Nessism View PostValves on the 8v engines tend to recess into the head thus the valve clearance goes down with use. Not sure about the 16v engines though but most likely they go down as well.
To the TS, you want to set them on the loose end of the spec.
Mark
Comment
-
I set them at .0051983 GS 1100E w/ 1230 kit, .340 lift Web Cams, Ape heavy duty valve springs, 83 1100 head with 1.5mm oversized SS intake valves, 1150 crank, Vance and Hines 1150 SuperHub, Star Racing high volume oil pump gears, 36mm carebs Dynojet stage 3 jet kit, Posplayr's SSPB, Progressive rear shocks and fork springs, Dyna 2000, Dynatek green coils and Vance & Hines 4-1 exhaust.
1985 GS1150ES stock with 85 Red E bodywork.
Comment
-
ryonker
I believe the specs on mine are .03 mm to .08 mm or .0012" to .0030". I am aiming at around .05mm to .06mm.
This is for a 79 GS 750L
Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by ryonker View PostI believe the specs on mine are .03 mm to .08 mm or .0012" to .0030". I am aiming at around .05mm to .06mm.
This is for a 79 GS 750L
Rick
1983 GS 1100E w/ 1230 kit, .340 lift Web Cams, Ape heavy duty valve springs, 83 1100 head with 1.5mm oversized SS intake valves, 1150 crank, Vance and Hines 1150 SuperHub, Star Racing high volume oil pump gears, 36mm carebs Dynojet stage 3 jet kit, Posplayr's SSPB, Progressive rear shocks and fork springs, Dyna 2000, Dynatek green coils and Vance & Hines 4-1 exhaust.
1985 GS1150ES stock with 85 Red E bodywork.
Comment
-
ryonker
Thanks Chef;
I should have asked it as a question.... .05 to .06 is a good healthy valve clearance to aim for, right? (for my 8 valve GS750).
Rick
Comment
-
With shims the highest number you can acheive is good. (in spec) Steve on this site has an Excel program for shims. PM him you email and he'll send it to you.1983 GS 1100E w/ 1230 kit, .340 lift Web Cams, Ape heavy duty valve springs, 83 1100 head with 1.5mm oversized SS intake valves, 1150 crank, Vance and Hines 1150 SuperHub, Star Racing high volume oil pump gears, 36mm carebs Dynojet stage 3 jet kit, Posplayr's SSPB, Progressive rear shocks and fork springs, Dyna 2000, Dynatek green coils and Vance & Hines 4-1 exhaust.
1985 GS1150ES stock with 85 Red E bodywork.
Comment
-
ryonker
So go for the the .08 mm? I suppose it makes sense, since the valves tend to get tighter. Except for one, mine were all slightly tighter than specs...
which I should have suspected since that's what you and all the experienced GSers are saying.
Thanks Chef!
Rick
Comment
-
TheCafeKid
Originally posted by ryonker View PostSo go for the the .08 mm? I suppose it makes sense, since the valves tend to get tighter. Except for one, mine were all slightly tighter than specs...
which I should have suspected since that's what you and all the experienced GSers are saying.
Thanks Chef!
Rick
On a secondary note, Mark M is correct. Not only do they seat, but they also tend to mushroom cap a bit. I asked Steve the other day, "Well, what happens when you run out of adjustment? What do you do then?" You by new valves and start from scratch. Guess all those 2.80s will come in handy someday after all...LOL
Comment
-
TheCafeKid
Originally posted by Shaughn12mils to 3mils might be a bit tight, heh.
I think we all knew you meant 12mils to 30mils, though :-)
Comment
-
Shaughn
Originally posted by TheCafeKid View Postits .0012 INCHES. or .03mm. lowest spec clearance. Basicly if you're there, change it. If i have the shims to do it, i change at .05. Keeps you from having to do it later. I'd rather change them all at once if possible, but of course they dont all wear at the same rate.
Fahker. Beat me to it. I deleted that post as soon as I posted it and had realized I was off by a tenth.
I work for a wire (among other things) manufacturer and we talk about everything in mils, which is a old (and non-ISO) term for thousands of an inch.
Same thing as 'thou'. And likewise .3mm ~= 12mil, and is a common size for a product I am developing. Brain read what it wanted to.Last edited by Guest; 06-29-2008, 02:08 AM.
Comment
-
TheCafeKid
Originally posted by Shaughn View PostFahker. Beat me to it. I deleted that post as soon as I posted it and realized I was off by a tenth.
Comment
-
Shaughn
Originally posted by TheCafeKid View PostS'all good. Personally, i cant think in inches on these bikes. As resistant as ive ever been to the metric system, when working on my bikes i cant relate in SAE, so i stick to the metric side of it. Steve confuses the hell out of me when he does his spread sheet cos he does it all in SAE. My brain sits there and tries to convert in my head, and I end up spending more time doing that than turning a wrench...lol
At work we specify wire over 20mils (.020",.508mm) by diameter, as you would expect.
Wire under 20mils, we specify by WEIGHT PER 200MM.
Which of course is different for the different materials we run.
So, for example, 100mg/200mm of steel wire is much thinner diameter than 100mg/200mm of tungsten or molybdenum wire.
Comment
Comment