Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

chain tensile strength

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Agemax View Post
    why bother going to a 520 if you cant decide whether or not it will stand the power, like you say, its hard to source a 520 kit and will wear out a lot quicker.
    makes sense to stick with a 530 conversion and stick with the norm. at least replacements are readily available.
    Plus no debate on tensile strength and chains and sprockets are readily available for good prices.
    Ed

    To measure is to know.

    Mikuni O-ring Kits For Sale...https://www.thegsresources.com/_foru...ts#post1703182

    Top Newbie Mistakes thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...d.php?t=171846

    Carb rebuild tutorial...https://gsarchive.bwringer.com/mtsac...d_Tutorial.pdf

    KZ750E Rebuild Thread...http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...0-Resurrection

    Comment


      #17
      its a width issue.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by jed.only View Post
        its a width issue.
        the difference in width from a standard 520 and a 530 chain is roughly 1.8mm. so 0.9 mm either side so how critical is your width issue?
        1978 GS1085.

        Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

        Comment


          #19
          i guess its not that bad.

          Comment


            #20
            Were you the winning bidder on that 520 chain on fleabay? That would explain it.

            We discussed this at length in another thread 'chain info - which ones to buy, etc.' that's probably just above or below this one before we got sidetracked there. (http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...d.php?t=131806)

            As I said in the other thread, I decided that the RK XSO 530 is the way to go - any chain stronger than this would be much more expensive and a waste of money. Although I'm replacing the chain on a CBX, that's not any different really than replacing one on a big GS.

            And, of course, a new chain must get new sprockets too if it is to have a full life...
            Last edited by Guest; 09-01-2008, 03:52 PM.

            Comment


              #21
              no, i didnt, but i read your threads, and a few others and decided that a 520 was more suitable for my bike, given i dont "hotrod" it.

              Comment


                #22
                FWIW, the thinnest X-ring 520 chain out there is the DID 520 ERV3. I have one on my GS1000 and it works great. I ride the bike pretty hard and I haven't had issues with it other than stretching a bit faster than a 525/530 chain.


                Where'd you source your 520 sprockets from?

                Comment


                  #23
                  i did a little digging. JT makes everything you need, you just have to know what to look for.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by 80GS1000 View Post
                    FWIW, the thinnest X-ring 520 chain out there is the DID 520 ERV3. I have one on my GS1000 and it works great. I ride the bike pretty hard and I haven't had issues with it other than stretching a bit faster than a 525/530 chain.


                    Where'd you source your 520 sprockets from?

                    that chain has a tensile strength of 8800ish.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      I'm running 520 on a modified 700. HP is considerably stronger than stock. It's more money than I'm sure you want to spend but I'm using a Regina ringed chain with Vortex sprockets meant for a GSXR and this combo is wearing better than any of the 530 chains and sprockets I previously used. I always bought RK or Tsubaki with new sprockets each time in the past.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        i plan on running JT sprockets and a good standard chain like Tsubaki or RK. the RK only has a tensile strength of 6800, though.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by jed.only View Post
                          but that is just it, a 520 is not engineered to fit a GS1000. a GS comes with a 630, a popular upgrade is a 530, and im looking to go 520 for a custom application.

                          i guess a better way to get an answer would be to ask this question:

                          is a chain tensile strength of 6800 enough for a GS1000?
                          I would say that, while you probably wouldn't snap this chain, you would be forever adjusting it and it would not last very long.

                          I would try for something of 8000 - 9000 lbs tensile strength.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X