Thanks, Dan
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Valve lash question
Collapse
X
-
drhach
Valve lash question
Hi everyone. I checked my valves today and I had a question for the gurus. The spec for lash is .03-.08 mm (1978 GS1000). I had a few valves that were at .09. Knowing that the shims change incrementally by .05mm, I opted to leave the .09mm settings. My logic here was that as they wear, the lash will decrease. So, if I put a shim in that will reduce it from .09 to .04, I'll effectively be shortening the time until the next adjustment is necessary. Does this make sense? I've always heard that a loose valve is preferable to a tighter one and I figured that .01mm out of spec would just result in a little more valve noise? So what do the experts think? Is it preferable to stay in spec, even if it brings you to the tight side of things, or is it ok to be a little out of spec (.01mm) as long as your err on the loose side?
Thanks, DanTags: None
-
Sounds good to me.
Leave them at .09, if that's what you have.
.sigpic
mine: 2000 Honda GoldWing GL1500SE and 1980 GS850G'K' "Junior"
hers: 1982 GS850GL - "Angel" and 1969 Suzuki T250 Scrambler
#1 son: 1986 Yamaha Venture Royale 1300 and 1982 GS650GL "Rat Bagger"
#2 son: 1980 GS1000G
Family Portrait
Siblings and Spouses
Mom's first ride
Want a copy of my valve adjust spreadsheet for your 2-valve per cylinder engine? Send me an e-mail request (not a PM)
(Click on my username in the upper-left corner for e-mail info.)
-
drhach
Thanks. I know that Suzuki engineers defined a range. I'm sure that valve noise is the issue outside of that range.
Comment
Comment