Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suspension Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Suspension Advice

    Regarding the progressive fork springs, I already have a set to be installed, but, the question is: It is really a good improvement (in addition to progressives) to install Racetech emulators??

    Which model of shocks is better for rear??

    Also, (I know) which is the correct way to fill the forks with air and the correct pressure??

    The bike is 1983 GS1100E

    #2
    Yes it is worth it.

    If you are over 200 lbs then progressive and racetech emulators work well with 15 wt oil. Ask me how I know .

    See this thead for a discussion. If you are lighter consider getting racetech springs or you might have to cut down your progressives some.




    Ohlins are the best. Katman has a pair:
    $750.00
    OHLINS SHOCKS, brand new in the box and ready to go

    Last edited by posplayr; 11-20-2008, 10:35 PM.

    Comment


      #3
      With the Progressive springs, you do not really need any air pressure. The fork seals seem to last much longer with 0 psi too.
      Tony.
      '82 GS1100E



      Comment


        #4
        Ohlins

        I agree with Posplayr You can't go wrong with the Ohlins, I bought this set from Katman for $750 a few months ago. Viewed a post just recently. I believe he still has some available. Well worth the money!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by posplayr View Post
          If you are lighter consider getting racetech springs or you might have to cut down your progressives some.
          Cutting down a coil spring makes it stiffer, not less stiff. If the Progressives are too stiff you will need to use an alternate spring with a lighter rate. The racetech ones are a good option.

          Yes, emulators are a fantastic improvement over the damper rod system. They are great for any weight of rider and offer a plush, more controlled ride than possible with the original forks.


          Mark

          Comment


            #6
            Mark

            Cutting down a coil spring makes it stiffer, not less stiff. If the Progressives are too stiff you will need to use an alternate spring with a lighter rate. The racetech ones are a good option.
            I agree on the first point; springs rates increase with cutting length. However on the second point it is a definite maybe. We have had members here post on cutting Progressive springs for this exact GS1100EZ/ED application when adding Racetech emulators to existing Progressive Springs.

            For my weight (200lbs), I was able to stuff the Progressive spring, with the additional 14 mm of stack height of the Racetech emulator into the tube. I have preload setting to the lowest level and while it is firm to stiff, the handling is excellent.

            However I can imagine if someone is lighter than this it will be too stiff and the static preload is just too high. Yes the better option would be to do Racetech springs which are presumably shorter to account for the emulators. However, another member has described reducing the length, which allows them to reduce the preload force more than the increase due to spring rate increasing.

            The apparent paradox is explained by the fact that even if I'm increasing spring stiffness of the stiffest Racetech spring from 0.95 Kg/mm to 98 Kg/mm (by removing 14 mm), the reduction of 14 mm of preload is removing about 13.8 Kg of preload because the shorter spring is now being compressed less.

            It would be better to get the right spring rate from Racetech, but some have worked around this as described.

            Pos

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by posplayr View Post
              However I can imagine if someone is lighter than this it will be too stiff and the static preload is just too high.
              I see what the problem is. This has nothing to do with the spring rate and everything to do with too much preload. In that case, cutting the springs is a reasonable thing to do. I cut nearly 4" off my Progressives to increase the rate near to what I wanted. I would have preferred to use the straight rate Racetech springs, but I couldn't get them up here at the time. I got the PS springs up to around 0.93kg/mm, which is still not as stiff as I would like but isn't too bad.

              Mark

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by posplayr View Post
                I agree on the first point; springs rates increase with cutting length. However on the second point it is a definite maybe. We have had members here post on cutting Progressive springs for this exact GS1100EZ/ED application when adding Racetech emulators to existing Progressive Springs.

                For my weight (200lbs), I was able to stuff the Progressive spring, with the additional 14 mm of stack height of the Racetech emulator into the tube. I have preload setting to the lowest level and while it is firm to stiff, the handling is excellent.

                However I can imagine if someone is lighter than this it will be too stiff and the static preload is just too high. Yes the better option would be to do Racetech springs which are presumably shorter to account for the emulators. However, another member has described reducing the length, which allows them to reduce the preload force more than the increase due to spring rate increasing.

                The apparent paradox is explained by the fact that even if I'm increasing spring stiffness of the stiffest Racetech spring from 0.95 Kg/mm to 98 Kg/mm (by removing 14 mm), the reduction of 14 mm of preload is removing about 13.8 Kg of preload because the shorter spring is now being compressed less.

                It would be better to get the right spring rate from Racetech, but some have worked around this as described.

                Pos
                I can see, I am 200# like you should have no problems.
                Thanks very much for your advice.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by jwhelan65 View Post
                  I agree with Posplayr You can't go wrong with the Ohlins, I bought this set from Katman for $750 a few months ago. Viewed a post just recently. I believe he still has some available. Well worth the money!
                  Ohlins seems to be very expensive for now.
                  What about Progressive Suspension 12 Series Shocks
                  ??
                  Progressive is a well known brand and prices are more accessible.
                  They are about $225

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by jacora View Post

                    What about Progressive Suspension 12 Series Shocks
                    ??
                    Thats what I have with HD Springs set to the #2 preload setting. You lose the dampening adjust but not a big deal for me. I realize its an old GS not a GSXR.
                    82 1100 EZ (red)

                    "You co-opting words of KV only thickens the scent of your BS. A thief and a putter-on of airs most foul. " JEEPRUSTY

                    Comment


                      #11
                      For 99% of riders, Progressive or Hagon rear shocks will do just fine. If you take your bike to the roadrace track, you might need additional adjustment and fade resistance offered with piggyback shock from Ohlins, Works Performance, etc....

                      These Works Performance Vintage Pro Racer shocks are beautiful, IMHO....

                      sigpic

                      SUZUKI:
                      1978 GS1000E; 1980 GS1000G; 1982 GS650E; 1982 GS1100G; 1982 GS1100E; 1985 GS700ES
                      HONDA: 1981 CB900F Super Sport
                      KAWASAKI: 1981 KZ550A-2; 1984 ZX750A-2 (aka GPZ750); 1984 KZ700A-1
                      YAMAHA: 1983 XJ750RK Seca

                      Free speech is the foundation of an open society. Each time a society bans a word or phrase it deems “offensive”, it chips away at that very foundation upon which it was built.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Griffin

                        Very Nice how much they go for?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by posplayr View Post
                          Very Nice how much they go for?
                          Without adjustable rebound dampening, about $700. With it (as pictured), closer to $850 or so.
                          sigpic

                          SUZUKI:
                          1978 GS1000E; 1980 GS1000G; 1982 GS650E; 1982 GS1100G; 1982 GS1100E; 1985 GS700ES
                          HONDA: 1981 CB900F Super Sport
                          KAWASAKI: 1981 KZ550A-2; 1984 ZX750A-2 (aka GPZ750); 1984 KZ700A-1
                          YAMAHA: 1983 XJ750RK Seca

                          Free speech is the foundation of an open society. Each time a society bans a word or phrase it deems “offensive”, it chips away at that very foundation upon which it was built.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X