I'm sure you are right about the limited amount of engagement not being a good thing. However, I felt that as long as my sprocket engagement width was the same or better than a 520 sprocket, things should be mostly alright.
My (perhaps poor) reasoning behind this is due to a) I have put about 50 launches at the drag strip on a 520 front sprocket (I didn't have the right tooth count 530 handy at the time), and b) my V-Strom, a 95ish hp large motorcycle, uses a 520 chain and etc and seems to do just fine with it, so, these things combined, I made the assumption that I could get away with it on my GS, at least until I crank up the HP past 110 or so.
So far, there has been no noticeable change to the splines, ie, they have not been twisted at the point of engagement, and sprockets slide up and down them without catching. However, I'm not a huge fan of doing it this way for long
At this point, I will probably go with a standard offset sprocket in the next couple of months once I get the front end swapped out and have time to concentrate on the engine.
I've spent the last week or so concentrating on getting a better handle on datalogging my track performance so I can identify what needs to be fixed up. I already have an Innovate wideband installed on the bike, but the LC-1 does not get RPM data, and I have found the graph to almost be useless without that. Being a tinkering sort of fellow, I have reverse engineered their serial protocol using the little bit of documentation they provide plus a lot of serial port captures and have emulated their SSI-4 box on a microcontroller. I've also got an embedded computer in a small enclosure that will get strapped to the seat and collect data that I can view later. I'll post pictures and further information about this stuff as I get it cleaned up and off the protoboard I also dug up a accelerometer chip in my parts bin that I have working, which might give me some interesting data.
Comment