Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GS1000 hydraulic clutch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    GS1000 hydraulic clutch

    i have decided i am going to convert my GS to hydraulic clutch. i plan on using a late Bandit M/C as they have the upright/flat bars,compared to the GSXR angled/clip on style bars.
    for the slave i will use a late Suzuki item, not sure which yet but a trawl through ebay should give an idea of what is what, although i think they are all pretty much the same......
    i already have a plate mounted over the front sprocket to mount the outrigger bearing so i will just need to extend that to mount the slave.

    GS750 pushrod oil seal in place of the 1000 blanking plug, and a push rod made by my local friendly engineer. will a one piece pushrod be ok or should i make it 2 piece with a bearing in between?

    with a hydraulic clutch i will then be able to machine out fully the clutch cover so i get the "proper" window clutch, instead of the "spider" in there at the moment.
    1978 GS1085.

    Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

    #2
    Sounds like a LOT of effort for a "look", but I like where it's going.

    I have thought of hydraulic, too, at times, but need to find a slave cylnder that pulls, not pushes, to match up with the release on the shafties.

    .
    sigpic
    mine: 2000 Honda GoldWing GL1500SE and 1980 GS850G'K' "Junior"
    hers: 1982 GS850GL - "Angel" and 1969 Suzuki T250 Scrambler
    #1 son: 1986 Yamaha Venture Royale 1300 and 1982 GS650GL "Rat Bagger"
    #2 son: 1980 GS1000G
    Family Portrait
    Siblings and Spouses
    Mom's first ride
    Want a copy of my valve adjust spreadsheet for your 2-valve per cylinder engine? Send me an e-mail request (not a PM)
    (Click on my username in the upper-left corner for e-mail info.)

    Comment


      #3
      i am not doing it JUST for the look, although that is a bonus,i like the feel and reliability of a hydraulic clutch plus i have never been able to correctly route the cable so it is almost hidden while still giving a nice smooth action
      1978 GS1085.

      Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

      Comment


        #4
        Mmm can be done - I can see why you want to but personally I wouldn't bother.
        Make the rod one piece in silver steel Heat the ends to cherry red and quench in oil to harden. BUT, only do this after you've established the right length, lol.
        Keep the needle roller thrust bearing at the pressure plate but you may need to make a carrier for it which fits inside the p plate and accepts the rod end. This won't need to be hardened.

        BTW - I've seen a hydraulic clutch conversion done with a brake slave cylinder pushing the std operating arm. You wouldn't like it as it's all visible and not neat....

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by GregT View Post
          Mmm can be done - I can see why you want to but personally I wouldn't bother.
          Make the rod one piece in silver steel Heat the ends to cherry red and quench in oil to harden. BUT, only do this after you've established the right length, lol.
          Keep the needle roller thrust bearing at the pressure plate but you may need to make a carrier for it which fits inside the p plate and accepts the rod end. This won't need to be hardened.

          BTW - I've seen a hydraulic clutch conversion done with a brake slave cylinder pushing the std operating arm. You wouldn't like it as it's all visible and not neat....
          so why "wouldn't you bother"? it is not difficult to do, the hardest part is getting the pushrod the correct length. i planned on making a small bearing housing for the rod to seat in the pressure plate, together with the thrust bearing.
          how was this brake cyilinder mounted? the operating arm would need to be rotated 180 degrees on the shaft in order to "push" it to disengage the clutch.got any pics of it?
          1978 GS1085.

          Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

          Comment


            #6
            this looks promising, nice and compact........

            1978 GS1085.

            Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

            Comment


              #7
              You have more control with a cable operated clutch

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by SqDancerLynn1 View Post
                You have more control with a cable operated clutch
                in what way? i have ridden loads of bikes with hydraulic clutches and all had good feel and easy control over feathering in the clutch
                1978 GS1085.

                Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Agemax View Post
                  in what way? i have ridden loads of bikes with hydraulic clutches and all had good feel and easy control over feathering in the clutch
                  We are on the same page Adrian.
                  I love hydraulic clutches ... "Art Ritis" in my left hand also agrees.
                  2000 Honda Valkyrie Tourer (it's gone)
                  1985 Suzuki Madura GV1200
                  2 X 1980 Suzuki GSX1100ETs (next project
                  s)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The easy of pull and amount of pull required is mostly dependent on the size of the slave. Most ducati owners swap for a larger piston slave because the stock one is a little tough for a 2 finger pull, but the distance you have to pull it is greatly reduced with the small piston.

                    I hope this helps you with your decision

                    edit: sorry, just saw it is dependent on the master size as well, although you have more selection in the slave size
                    Last edited by Guest; 04-05-2013, 07:05 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by mrl1000l View Post
                      The easy of pull and amount of pull required is mostly dependent on the size of the slave. Most ducati owners swap for a larger piston slave because the stock one is a little tough for a 2 finger pull, but the distance you have to pull it is greatly reduced with the small piston.

                      I hope this helps you with your decision

                      edit: sorry, just saw it is dependent on the master size as well, although you have more selection in the slave size
                      thanks for that, makes good sense. i have just found this on ebay.......



                      which should help a lot. and at that price its got to be worth a try
                      1978 GS1085.

                      Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Agemax View Post
                        so why "wouldn't you bother"? it is not difficult to do, the hardest part is getting the pushrod the correct length. i planned on making a small bearing housing for the rod to seat in the pressure plate, together with the thrust bearing.
                        how was this brake cyilinder mounted? the operating arm would need to be rotated 180 degrees on the shaft in order to "push" it to disengage the clutch.got any pics of it?
                        I wouldn't bother because I build racebikes - on the KISS principle....

                        don't have any pics sorry, it was a road bike i did a tune on several years ago. From memory the slave was mounted on a plate bolted onto the top case using various extended case bolts and spacers. It worked but it couldn't have been called neat.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by GregT View Post
                          I wouldn't bother because I build racebikes - on the KISS principle....

                          don't have any pics sorry, it was a road bike i did a tune on several years ago. From memory the slave was mounted on a plate bolted onto the top case using various extended case bolts and spacers. It worked but it couldn't have been called neat.
                          ok cool, well my GS is only a road bike.
                          so what is your KISS principle?
                          1978 GS1085.

                          Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Agemax View Post
                            ok cool, well my GS is only a road bike.
                            so what is your KISS principle?
                            You've never heard of it ?

                            Keep It Simple, Stupid...

                            If I'm away at a race meeting and snap a clutch cable, the fix is much easier than hunting for a replacement mastercylinder or slave cylinder seals.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              after a bit more thought i am going to stick with the bandit M/C and slave cylinder. they were designed to work with each other so it makes sense to stick with a matched pair.
                              plenty available on ebay
                              1978 GS1085.

                              Just remember, an opinion without 3.14 is just an onion!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X