->This is not necessarily true. The needle/float combination is designed to allow fuel to flow into the float bowl when it drops to a certain level, and stop it flowing when it rises to a certain level. When the engine is running they can do this very well and still be a bit leaky, and performance will not necessarily be affected. They are opening and closing all the time anyway. A bit of leaking when they are closed isn't likely to change float level significantly in a running engine unless there is a really grave condition.
The petcock on the other hand is designed to shut off the gas supply to the bike when the engine is not running.
These are two separate functions, and it isn't entirely correct to expect the float needles, which are designed to regulate fuel level, to also perform the job of the petcock, which is designed to completely stop gas from reaching the carbs.
I think most of us would agree that in an ideal world we would go to the store and buy the right part and install it using the methods in the factory service manual. However in real life, after a decade or four of doing that, one develops a sense of what is good mechanical practice and what is not, and we make these decisions for ourselves, and when we find something that works, we sometimes pass it on. That's what makes the forum so great.
The point I was really trying to make is that it perhaps doesn't help the forum if we use words like 'cheap' or 'ghetto', or any other pejorative to describe repair suggestions. This particular one is widely accepted...even preferred... by some very fastidious mechanics. Most of us know that it's good if everything is perfect and factory and expensive all the time. However, the fact is that everything rarely is perfect all the time. Sometimes the float needles do not seal for one reason or another.
At that point, a diaphragm petcock, which is designed to stop all flow of gas to the carbs, may fail to protect your engine from hydrolock. A mechanical inline petcock is fail safe. Why knock it?
S.
Comment