Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For those that advocate using 87 octane in these bikes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by Dogma View Post
    So don't light 'em on fire.

    I wonder if those tiny little things might not slip through the rubber anyway. Or in the case of H2 at 30-odd psi, react with the rubber in some unfavorable way. I did see (on TV) propane used to inflate a landing gear tire.

    That may prove problematic given my preferred method of tire inflation...

    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by koolaid_kid View Post
      This thread has finally gone wacky, btw.
      yes! i'm winning!

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by koolaid_kid View Post
        Then you could have a bar-b-que after you landed.
        This thread has finally gone wacky, btw.
        This thread started wacky.
        Dogma
        --
        O LORD, be gracious to me; heal me, for I have sinned against you! - David

        Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. - Carl Sagan

        --
        '80 GS850 GLT
        '80 GS1000 GT
        '01 ZRX1200R

        How to get a "What's New" feed without the Vortex, and without permanently quitting the Vortex

        Comment


          #79


          FIGHT

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by old_skool
            just to open old wounds, pulled this from a Suzuki manual

            All Suzuki motorcycles were two strokes at the time, so how relevant is it?
            "Men will never be free until Mark learns to do The Twist."

            -Denis D'shaker

            79 GS750N

            Comment


              #81
              Originally posted by Allie View Post
              All Suzuki motorcycles were two strokes at the time, so how relevant is it?
              And 87 octane WAS premium-grade at the time!

              Comment


                #82
                Originally posted by Allie View Post
                All Suzuki motorcycles were two strokes at the time, so how relevant is it?
                It isn't.

                What Suzuki meant was don't use rubbish fuel - and you could get some real crap in the old communist eastern Europe, for instance, that was smuggled across in to the west every now and then. Suzuki weren't referring to the octane rating. The UK owner manuals at the time always just said leaded 2 Star (our lowest rating) - 87 octane - for the whole range.
                79 GS1000S
                79 GS1000S (another one)
                80 GSX750
                80 GS550
                80 CB650 cafe racer
                75 PC50 - the one with OHV and pedals...
                75 TS100 - being ridden (suicidally) by my father

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by old_skool
                  Second, don't know what part of the country you lived in in the early 70's, 98 super high test was available in Ohio.
                  First off, I was born in '79. Second, just a joke - relax.

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by old_skool
                    Wow, why does everybody just assume contradition is an argument, seeing as you were from Ca, and in the early 70's emissions starting coming into play, and Ca was always ahead of everyone else due to smog control, thought maybe Ca only had 87. I was stirring the pot for the die hard octane guys, and everybody has a tender spot for controversey as of late.
                    Wasn't assuming anything. Just highlighting the fact that I'm younger than most of you geezers for a bit of Sunday-morning ribbing.

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Originally posted by old_skool
                      I thought maybe you thought I was getting mad or something, far from it, see, the post worked, started some morning coffee spilling <---should have used more of these
                      Yeah, I've never warmed up to the emoticons and that's my own reluctance to fully abandon typographic culture. Maybe I'm a conservative after all?

                      (Sh*t, we don't want this turning P!)

                      I wasn't salty in the least, I promise. Reading it again, I can see how "relax" could seem aggressive. I just meant it as "I'm WAY too young to have a reliably-informed opinion on the matter at hand, so please disregard my conversational contributions as their intended folly, nothing more."

                      Comment


                        #86
                        You stirred the pot, so don't cry when ums gets spattered... I still think it's an interesting question, how does fuel grade and/or octane rating (I didn't mention octane either, just asked a question) compare from two stroke to four stroke engines? Impossible to tell from original fuel specs, but I bet a lot of folks that have both bikes and run on modern fuels have insight.
                        "Men will never be free until Mark learns to do The Twist."

                        -Denis D'shaker

                        79 GS750N

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by UncleMike View Post
                          I can see how "relax" could seem aggressive.
                          Well I AM RELAXED!!!!!!!!

                          "Men will never be free until Mark learns to do The Twist."

                          -Denis D'shaker

                          79 GS750N

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Allie View Post
                            You stirred the pot, so don't cry when ums gets spattered... I still think it's an interesting question, how does fuel grade and/or octane rating (I didn't mention octane either, just asked a question) compare from two stroke to four stroke engines?
                            Impossible to tell from original fuel specs, but I bet a lot of folks that have both bikes and run on modern fuels have insight.
                            I have two 2-stroke motorcycles and a 2-stroke twin boat engine.
                            They all run on premium fuel mixed with synthetic oil/dino oil blend.
                            Two are piston port engines and one has reed valves.

                            Eric

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Originally posted by old_skool
                              Second, don't know what part of the country you lived in in the early 70's, 98 super high test was available in Ohio.
                              I used to be able to buy 100 octane at any station around here for about 32 cents through the mid '70s.

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Originally posted by 7981GS View Post
                                I have two 2-stroke motorcycles and a 2-stroke twin boat engine.
                                They all run on premium fuel mixed with synthetic oil/dino oil blend.
                                Two are piston port engines and one has reed valves.

                                Eric
                                Just curious, what are the compression ratios, and what are the factory fuel recommendations? Of what vintage are they?
                                "Men will never be free until Mark learns to do The Twist."

                                -Denis D'shaker

                                79 GS750N

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X