Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
For those that advocate using 87 octane in these bikes
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostAvoiding ethanol is probably OK, but I'm not sure that using 94 octane gas is the way to do it.
Higher-octane gas has fewer BTUs per gallon and burns slower, so you will not get any more power by simply putting it in your tank..
Or just not worth the extra cost?Old age and treachery will beat youth and skill every time1983 GS 750
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4256/3...8bf549ee_t.jpghttps://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4196/3...cab9f62d_t.jpg
Comment
-
Originally posted by tkent02 View PostYou don't need as much octane up here, as the air is less dense. Wide open throttle lets in less air than at sea level, so the tendency to detonate is lessened. 85 is enough for these low compression engines.
Another way to look at it, if you have 20% less dense air, it is exactly the same as having 20% lower compression ratio, so lower octane fuel is just fine.
It also helps that it's not likely to be 110 degrees F at 10,000 feet.
The flip side of this is we get less power, all normally aspirated engines make noticeably less power up here than they do at sea level.
The higher you go, the less power the engine can make.
A 1000 cc bike at 10,000 ft goes about like a 650 at sea level, without the high RPM kick."Men will never be free until Mark learns to do The Twist."
-Denis D'shaker
79 GS750N
Comment
-
1_v8_merc
I run 100LL in my 750 sometimes, just to give it a break from that ethanol garbage.
Usually I'll just mix it with 93 octane...she runs excellent with it.
(hey the manual calls for Leaded OR unleaded 92 octane...)
The 650, I run 87, because it's a factory motor, and the manual calls for it.Last edited by Guest; 04-07-2012, 02:32 AM.
Comment
-
koolaid_kid
My GS used to ping (detonate) on 87 and 89 octane. Really sucked on rallies when we got into a tiny town that only had one station and it only had 87 octane. Once I put in a Dyna S ignition and timed it with my timing light I was able to run 87 octane in it.
I only run the highest octane in the GPz because the compression ratio is around 11.00:1.
Comment
-
mike_of_bbg
I have a Pure station here in town that I try to frequent for my carbureted fueling needs. They have non-ethanol blends in 87-93. My GS has never pinged on 87. The cars with fuel injectors and high-pressure fuel pumps get whatever excuse for gas I can get the cheapest. Though, I've never had an issue with the oxygenated blends or letting gas sit in anything before except for my Honda mower. Which reminds me, it's time to drain that mower's tank and drop the contents into the Briggs-powered mower. That Briggs will drink anything.
Last time I looked at my local gas station pump, it said the Octane rating was using the (R+M)/2 method. And there's nothing available here below 87 or above 93. So it looks like I can't buy anything that doesn't meet Suzuki's requirements of 85-94?
Oh, I've also heard that ethanol (among its other properties) is an anti-knock additive, so I'd expect to find more of it in high-octane gas. Motors actually designed for pure ethanol can run much higher compression ratios than their gasoline counterparts.
Comment
-
In a carbureted vehicle not that has not had the mixture adjusted for modern fuels (richened to compensate for lower energy content), ANY regular ethanol will tend to run leaner, hotter, and might detonate. Since the 89+ gas has a higher octane rating, it is more resistant to detonation. This does not, however, do anything to improve the running hot/lean situation, and just masks the problem.
The right thing to do is sort the jetting. First of all you will probably set it a little rich just for good measure, making it run cooler than from the factory, but if the fuel in the tank is a low ethanol blend, you are now properly jetted for 10% ethanol you can run 10% Ethanol 87 all day long/oxygenated fuel and not have any problems. If you drive through an area with non blend gas, you can fill up and while you might run a little rich, at least it won't hurt your bike.Last edited by spchips; 04-08-2012, 09:35 AM.Yamaha fz1 2007
Comment
-
koolaid_kid
spchips, you may wish to reconsider your terminology. Ethanol 87 is blend of up to 87% ethanol. Around here we use Ethanol 10 in octane ratings of 87, 89, 91, 92 and 93.
Comment
-
Originally posted by koolaid_kid View Postspchips, you may wish to reconsider your terminology. Ethanol 87 is blend of up to 87% ethanol. Around here we use Ethanol 10 in octane ratings of 87, 89, 91, 92 and 93.Yamaha fz1 2007
Comment
-
koolaid_kid
Yeah, when I moved into my current house I was surrounded by cornfields. It has been built up since then, but I can still walk down the road to some.
Around here E85 is sold in select stations, and lots of vehicles are now "flex fuel" vehicles, meaning you can run pretty much anything and the computer will make adjustments as required.
Comment
-
Too bad there werent GS carbs that would adjust accordingly.MY BIKES..1977 GS 750 B, 1978 GS 1000 C (X2)
1978 GS 1000 E, 1979 GS 1000 S, 1973 Yamaha TX 750, 1977 Kawasaki KZ 650B1, 1975 Honda GL1000 Goldwing, 1983 CB 650SC Nighthawk, 1972 Honda CB 350K4, 74 Honda CB550
NEVER SNEAK UP ON A SLEEPING DOG..NOT EVEN YOUR OWN.
I would rather trust my bike to a "QUACK" that KNOWS how to fix it rather than a book worm that THINKS HE KNOWS how to fix it.
Comment
-
2WheelEnthusiast
running higher octane gas in a motor that wasn't designed to take advantage of the higher octane is wasting money and hurting performance.
I just googled my 850's CR and it was 8.8 to 1, which is not even worthy of 91. My hill climbing 1000cc high compression sled running N2O was 14.3 to 1, and required 110 octane at sea level.
Now my nicer dirtbikes will get 91 non-oxy but thats just because they typically run WFO, and REQUIRE a minimum of 91 octane.
.... but in defense of the ppl wasting money on race fuel... it smells FFing awesome.
Comment
-
ZakDanger
Sooooo.... what the hell am I supposed to put in my tank? This is almost as bad as the felt vs tyvek arguments on CT.
Comment
-
Forum LongTimerGSResource Superstar
Past Site Supporter- Oct 2006
- 13968
- London, UK to Redondo Beach, California
The octane number reduces as the gas goes old too... if you're planning to leave it in the tank a while it's better to use a higher octane.
I have used all 3 grades in my Suzuki, usually a higher grade if I know I'll be out of town for a couple of weeks or something.
I live at sea level & 87 doesn't knock...
1980 GS1000G - Sold
1978 GS1000E - Finished!
1980 GS550E - Fixed & given to a friend
1983 GS750ES Special - Sold
2009 KLR 650 - Sold - gone to TX!
1982 GS1100G - Rebuilt and finished. - Sold
2009 TE610 - Dual Sporting around dreaming of Dakar..... - FOR SALE!
www.parasiticsanalytics.com
TWINPOT BRAKE UPGRADE LINKY: http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum...e-on-78-Skunk/
Comment
-
barnbiketom
I used to work as a line tech in a GM garage. For years when the weather got cold suddenly in the fall, we would get a slew of Grand Ams come in on the hook ( tow truck) It turns out EVERY one of them , the owners were putting in 'hi octane' gas. On the Grand Ams with higher mileage and poorly maintainenance, the resistance to ignition of the wrong gas resulted in FLOODING AND NO STARTS HAHHA. Insidethe garage ,when the car warmed up, it would always start!!! the higher the octane, the more RESISTANT to ignition. it's the compression ratio of your engine that determines octane requirements, it is not that "hi octane" puts out more power or "runs better ". people at the pump are simply uneductated and the gas companies don't help , why hell... they want YOU to waste money.
Comment
Comment