Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Balancing beads
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by posplayr View PostProbably leaking because your rims have oxidized and small leaks pass through at the bead of the rim. I had and 81 GS750EX that was going flat fast (about the same time as yours) and broke the tires off the rims, wire wheels the centers, applied a bit of silicone spray and re assembled. Leaks gone.
I got a lot of grief for the silicone spray on the inside of the rims but it never seemed to give a problem. A generous lubing with tire sealant would also probably protect the tires. If you are anal, spray paint them.
Mark1982 GS1100E
1998 ZX-6R
2005 KTM 450EXC
Comment
-
Originally posted by mmattockx View PostInteresting, that's a thought. They certainly weren't visibly oxidized or I would have cleaned it up before installing the new tires. I will have a look next time I change the front tire and maybe give it a scrubbing. When you say silicone spray are you talking about silicone lube or something else?
Mark
This works well on anything including exhaust. Use to protect your forks.
Comment
-
GS450L
-
At least as much as the rim lock weighs, but a dirt bike normally doesn't travel at highway speeds much, anyway.NO PIC THANKS TO FOTO BUCKET FOR BEING RIDICULOUS
Current Rides: 1980 Suzuki GS1000ET, 2009 Yamaha FZ1, 1983 Honda CB1100F, 2006 H-D Fatboy
Previous Rides: 1972 Yamaha DS7, 1977 Yamaha RD400D, '79 RD400F Daytona Special, '82 RD350LC, 1980 Suzuki GS1000E (sold that one), 1982 Honda CB900F, 1984 Kawasaki GPZ900R
Comment
-
I've used them, and they do definitely work. They were a bit fiddly to install, maybe not worse than balancing, and probably made a mess when those tires came off. They cost a little more than weights. Whatever. What I didn't like about them is that a large bump at freeway speeds could upset the beads while the wheel is spinning too fast for them to redistribute themselves (centrifugal force). So I had to slow down quite a bit until the wheel stopped hopping. So I've decided I don't like them on a vehicle where that can happen.Dogma
--
O LORD, be gracious to me; heal me, for I have sinned against you! - David
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. - Carl Sagan
--
'80 GS850 GLT
'80 GS1000 GT
'01 ZRX1200R
How to get a "What's New" feed without the Vortex, and without permanently quitting the Vortex
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dogma View PostI've used them, and they do definitely work. They were a bit fiddly to install, maybe not worse than balancing, and probably made a mess when those tires came off. They cost a little more than weights. Whatever. What I didn't like about them is that a large bump at freeway speeds could upset the beads while the wheel is spinning too fast for them to redistribute themselves (centrifugal force). So I had to slow down quite a bit until the wheel stopped hopping. So I've decided I don't like them on a vehicle where that can happen.
The first out-of-balance resonance is 35-40 mph and then the next one would be 70-80 mph. So if you hit a pothole at 60 mph, you are saying it makes the balance worse until you slow down to 35-40?
What brand/type of beads were you using? Was there a freeway speed where this problem started, as in ok at 55 put bad at 65?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jabcb View PostInteresting. I was considering using them. Did a bit of online research & there barely was any mention of this. Big rig guys seem to big fans of the beads.
The first out-of-balance resonance is 35-40 mph and then the next one would be 70-80 mph. So if you hit a pothole at 60 mph, you are saying it makes the balance worse until you slow down to 35-40?
What brand/type of beads were you using? Was there a freeway speed where this problem started, as in ok at 55 put bad at 65?
The big trucks would probably never have this problem, since the OD of those tires is so much larger. Centrifugal force is inverse linear with radius, so I wouldn't expect the same problem to manifest for them until somewhere well over 100 mph, at which point rubber heating probably takes over as the big problem (the beads stick to hot rubber, so don't do track speeds with them). Tires are a big expense for trucks, so I can see how they would like a self balancing tire for maximum life purposes.Dogma
--
O LORD, be gracious to me; heal me, for I have sinned against you! - David
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. - Carl Sagan
--
'80 GS850 GLT
'80 GS1000 GT
'01 ZRX1200R
How to get a "What's New" feed without the Vortex, and without permanently quitting the Vortex
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dogma View PostUh, lemme see.. I used DynaBeads. On that section of I-275, I was probably doing something like 70-75 mph. It only happened a couple times out of all the trips I took on that bike at similar speeds or higher. It takes a bump that makes you say "OW!" I don't know where the resonances are, and they would change from bike to bike anyway. I don't remember clearly anymore how much I had to slow down, but I think I needed an off-ramp to do it. So, probably less than 60, maybe a lot less.
The big trucks would probably never have this problem, since the OD of those tires is so much larger. Centrifugal force is inverse linear with radius, so I wouldn't expect the same problem to manifest for them until somewhere well over 100 mph, at which point rubber heating probably takes over as the big problem (the beads stick to hot rubber, so don't do track speeds with them). Tires are a big expense for trucks, so I can see how they would like a self balancing tire for maximum life purposes.
I ordered the Counteract balancing beads & will give them a try on a little GT380 cafe build in the next week or so.
Comment
-
aclaytonb
I use them and they work fine as long as you go slow and dont pile them up in the funnel/hose/whatever. My 8yr old daughter put them in the front tire pretty much by herself. They went into the tube, however, not straight into the tire.
Pushed the 550 over 90mph with no vibration issues. 1oz in front, 2oz in back. I forget the brand but they were abt $15 on ebay. Dont usually get a lot of slab time so I cant comment on touring use.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandy View PostGood idea but unfortunately the nearest bike wrecker is a 4 1/2 hour drive away. I've got a few of each type as well as some stickons kicking around but the new sealed wheel bearings have a little too much stiction to do a good job of static balancing right now anyway so I'll give the beads a try. I've read they don't necessarily work that great at super high speeds but that shouldn't be a problem on a stodgy old 1000. LOL.'84 GS750EF (Oct 2015 BOM) '79 GS1000N (June 2007 BOM) My Flickr site http://www.flickr.com/photos/soates50/
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4306/35860327946_08fdd555ac_z.jpg
Comment
-
Just curious question for this morning…
Is there any rough relationship between the amount of conventional wheel weights used & the amount of balancing beads to use?
The Suzuki weights that attach to spokes are available in 20 & 30G sizes (.71 & 1.06 oz). If you took off a 30G weight, what amount of balancing beads would you need to add?
Comment
-
1 ounce for front typically and 2 for back.MY BIKES..1977 GS 750 B, 1978 GS 1000 C (X2)
1978 GS 1000 E, 1979 GS 1000 S, 1973 Yamaha TX 750, 1977 Kawasaki KZ 650B1, 1975 Honda GL1000 Goldwing, 1983 CB 650SC Nighthawk, 1972 Honda CB 350K4, 74 Honda CB550
NEVER SNEAK UP ON A SLEEPING DOG..NOT EVEN YOUR OWN.
I would rather trust my bike to a "QUACK" that KNOWS how to fix it rather than a book worm that THINKS HE KNOWS how to fix it.
Comment
Comment