R
reddirtrider
Guest
It may be a little high, but I estimated by taking a bit off what the Kawasaki makes thinking it can go a bit faster yet. Interesting though that frontal area drag is related to velocity cubed. I guess that explains why incremental increases in speed once you get past 120 are not trivial. I'll make a note of that.The estimate is a little on the high side, as it represents the increase in hp required due to frontal area drag. Frontal area drag required hp that increases to the 3rd power of velocity. Any internal drag terms such as engine drag or to the extent that rolling resistance do not increase to the square of velocity then all drag components do not contribute to the 3rd power rule.
Hp = Force x velocity
C x V^2 x V = C x V^3
However it was interesting that Chef and I were BSing one day and used the formula to estimate the horsepower and top speed of the world record holding busa and then related that to KrisV's nitors/turbo 1150. I don't have the figures but the conclusion was that the model worked well to predict top speed/hp requirements. It ignores gearing and RPM obviously.
You gotta be slippery - that's the real key to speed.