• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

can't lock front brakes

  • Thread starter Thread starter p_s
  • Start date Start date
P

p_s

Guest
'85 GS550ES

I went to a parking lot yesterday for the first time ever to just practice braking. At 30 mph and lower I can't seem to lock the front. I have stainless brake lines, new seals and fluid. The lever is very stiff and I was grabbing as hard as I could. I'm not sure what the pads are--the PO put them in. Green backing with gray pads. I have a fairly soft front tire--an Avon Roadrider.

Do I need a MC with a smaller bore or is that just how old bikes are? A friend has a stock '88 Ninja that has never seen a wrench and he says he can lock the front with two fingers.
 
The only times I've locked the front, I dumped the bike. I hope I never lock the front again. Sorry, that didn't answer your question.
 
Perhaps a manual pump vac bleeder.

rphillips i know how you feel i dumped a trainer bike at 30mph locking up the front brakes! personally i'd rather not have them lock up.

It seems with the anti dive it is difficult to porperly bleed the brakes. I manually bled mine the old school way not with a ez vac brake bleeder, and i cannot lock my front brakes. Though i would not want to.

On my porsche i went with a LARGER bore MC to get more pressure i went from a 17mm to 19mm and stainless lines and this made the brake pedal firmer than stock. Big improvement over stock.

I don't know what the solution is for these bikes with anti dive other than to remove the anti dive from the forks.
 
Last edited:
Does it pull the bike up from a decent speed? Does it feel responsive enough that you will be able to stop when a car pulls out of a driveway onto the road without looking?
If you answered yes & yes - don't worry about it.

Old bikes tend to have 'spongey' brakes. As long as you feel safe with it. If not, you might think about a later model brake upgrade.
 
The brakes aren't spongy whatsoever. Much stiffer than my neighbor's 2008 SV650 with rubber lines. I can't get the lever anywhere near the grip. I also don't have the brake linked anti-dive on my bike (that was changed in '84 or '85). I just think there must be some braking force left if I can't lock it up.

P.S. I used a vacuum brake bleeder today to do the car. What a PITA! It was less of an environmental disaster than when I change the other fluids on the car, but only because there is less of it to begin with. Still had to call the wife out to pump the brakes. Next time I might find a spare MC cap and plumb it to compressed air and pressure bleed the brakes.
 
On my porsche i went with a LARGER bore MC to get more pressure i went from a 17mm to 19mm and stainless lines and this made the brake pedal firmer than stock. Big improvement over stock.

I hate to tell you this, but a larger bore generates less pressure for any given amount of pedal or lever force, not more. It will firm up the feel because it takes more force to generate any given level of stopping force.

Mark
 
You shouldn't be locking up the brake at 20 or 30, it's a loss of control.

The question you need to ask is, did my tire moan?

Well, did it?

That's the sound of nearly at brake lock up.

If it doesn't moan (this is more apparent at speed) then you need to try:

1. Softer brake pads
2. More modern calipers (as in the Kawasaki twinpot mod - see Performance)

The master cylinder cannot create a higher coefficient of friction between the rotor and the pad, and that is what you need to stop faster.

Modern bikes, like your buddies, stop faster because they have 4 piston brakes, better brake material, bigger and better rotors, and stickier tires. Plus better balance of the Center of mass and all that physics stuff.

It is 30 year old technology, after all.
 
I hate to tell you this, but a larger bore generates less pressure for any given amount of pedal or lever force, not more. It will firm up the feel because it takes more force to generate any given level of stopping force.

Mark

Thanks for the correction.

Just expressing the experience i have had with a required modification on a popular car that worked for me, as such perhaps a bigger mc is available to give the same level of increased braking performance for the GS that i experienced with my porsche. Although pedal effort is higher( increased pedal pressure i should have said is needed ), it provides less pedal travel and eliminates the spongy feeling of the original lines.

I pasted this following article ( using car braking systems as example but some principles may apply to bikes) which goes into detail explaining the pros and cons of bigger bore mc's. Ultimately it's a matter of what you are looking to achieve from your ride, that determines what size mc is best to use.

"Technical Corner

With regard to braking it’s always helpful to refresh the basic rules of brake systems. If you fit larger discs you will increase the braking mechanical advantage. This will reduce pedal effort. If you find this results in brakes that are too sensitive for track use you can increase pedal effort by changing the master cylinder or removing the brake servo. A larger master cylinder bore size will increase pedal effort but reduce pedal travel. Master cylinders are usually available in inch sizes, pedal effort in lbs per sq inch and piston sizes in mm (great!).

Some formulas will demonstrate what you might end up with:

If you increase disc size from 284mm to 300mm you would end up with a 5% decrease in the pedal force required to get the same braking force. Therefore a 100lb force required before would become 95lb

New pedal force = Pedal force x (Old brake disc radius/New brake disc radius)

The rolling radius of the tyre has the opposite effect - increase the diameter of the tyre/wheel combination and you increase the pedal force required.

New pedal force = Pedal force x (Old tyre radius/New tyre radius)

In this case if you went from a 14” Wheel with 195/60 up to a 16” wheel with 205/55 you would increase the pedal effort required by 10%.

When looking at master cylinders the formula is as follows:

New pedal force = Pedal force x (new master cylinder bore diameter?/ old master cylinder bore diameter)?

Because of the square in the above formula the effect of a change is more pronounced. E.g a move from a 1” master cylinder to a 1.25” master cylinder will change the pedal force required from 100lbs to 156lbs.

Next thing to remember is bigger pistons in the calipers mean more force and, therefore, less pedal effort. Bigger pistons in the calipers mean more pedal movement. For comparing one brake to another on the same car, you can simply multiply the total caliper piston area times the effective radius. If you have a sliding calliper although it has piston(s) on one side the area should be doubled. A single piston sliding calliper with the same piston size as a twin fixed calliper will have the same clamping force.

When planning your braking modifications it is a good idea to consider these factors. Naturally bigger brakes often require bigger wheels so the two cancel each other out to a degree."
 
Last edited:
The brakes aren't spongy whatsoever. Much stiffer than my neighbor's 2008 SV650 with rubber lines. I can't get the lever anywhere near the grip. I also don't have the brake linked anti-dive on my bike (that was changed in '84 or '85). I just think there must be some braking force left if I can't lock it up.

P.S. I used a vacuum brake bleeder today to do the car. What a PITA! It was less of an environmental disaster than when I change the other fluids on the car, but only because there is less of it to begin with. Still had to call the wife out to pump the brakes. Next time I might find a spare MC cap and plumb it to compressed air and pressure bleed the brakes.

Thanks for clarifying that i was under the impression all the E and ES's 83-86 had the anti-dive.
 
You say you have new break pads how new ? have you given them time to bed in
Er, actually not that new. 4.5 years old & about 10k miles, but there's still 2 or 3 mm of pad before the wear indicators. I have a pair of spare rotors so I might get sintered pads next time and see what happens.

I'm not really looking to lock the front, but I'm not getting the howl either. I was really trying to get it to lockup at low speeds (like 20) so I could learn how to modulate it and learn how to get the tire to howl but not lock-up. On the rear brake this is no problem. I understand it has to do with the ratio of the bores and the number of pots and so on. I might look into putting on a different MC if that'd give me more braking power but otherwise I'll probably just leave it alone.

I've never been in a situation where I simply needed more braking power, but I've only been riding for 2.5 years.
 
The combination of hard lever and no lock is a puzzle. If the throw of the plunger in the mc is too short, or the diameter of the bore is too small for the system, that would account for the pistons not having enough travel to drive the pads into the disk.
But if that were the case I do not think you would have a 'stiff' lever.
I would look for some mechanical problem...filthy dirty cylinders, seriously scored pistons, deranged levers, worn rubber bits...things that would actually impede motion between the lever and the pad.

In the interests of diagnoses, could you put something like bits of paper or cardboard between the pad and the disk and see if the pad actually can come tight against the disk when the lever is compressed? This would determine whether the problem was too much travel or poor hydraulic performance.
S.
 
In the interests of diagnoses, could you put something like bits of paper or cardboard between the pad and the disk and see if the pad actually can come tight against the disk when the lever is compressed? This would determine whether the problem was too much travel or poor hydraulic performance.
I pulled the covers and you could see the shims flexing slightly when I pull the lever. The tire spins freely when I release the lever. The seals & pistons in the calipers are 6 months/8k miles old, the MC seal & piston is 4.5 years/11k miles old. The bike still stops very quickly if you really grab the lever. I was just wondering what was normal, and it seems like noone here with a stock braking system can lock the front, so I guess I am satisfied that nothing is wrong. I was a little surprised that my friend's Ninja, which is just 3 years younger, brakes like modern sportbikes--2 finger lock up.
 
I must be out of my element. You lost me at 'shims'
S.
#13. It moves.

2109_62.gif
 
Just to add to the mystery.. back in 80-81 I had a 78 GS1000 which when I tested, would lock :eek:(only briefly, as I'd ease lever pressure). It had the older (no hole) disks.

I now have a 85 (same as your 82 models) GS1100G and was also wondering about the lack of feedback. So I grabbed a quick handful (when in a straight line) at about 40-45 mph and the front let go for the fraction of a :eek:second it took to register and release the lever. That was a hard and fast test and I've only done it the once.

When riding I have had occasion :eek: [ http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showthread.php?t=134357&page=3 ] to have to increase braking fairly quickly and have heard (and dare I say 'felt') the front tyre moaning without locking up (but neither was the lever bottomed out). I think it would if I squeezed harder.

Have also heard her moaning at me a few times while braking in corners:)

All on stock disk/rotors, calipers and lines.

I have new braided lines to install soon as I get off my a@%e
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the clarification. The shims would have to flex as they are transmitting the movement of the piston to the pad.
Since the brakes are working we know the pistons are moving.
The first question I would have is 'why aren't the pistons moving far enough to fully compress the pads against the disks'? The second would be 'is catastrophic failure around the corner'?
S.
 
Ya kno', If you described those symptoms to me on a car,
and I trusted your abilities as a tech, I'd suggest that the
rotors were glazed. Excessive/improper (i.e. draggging) pads
can overheat the rotor over time, and while may not be enough
to warp the rotor (that pulsation at speed) it may be enough
to harden rotor making it glaze, and not grab the pads correctly.

This is a subtle thing in appearance, but you'll definitely notice
it in performance. I'd take a rotary tool with a brown 3M roloc
and burnish the rotor, or if you have a brake lathe, skim cut it. If the
rotor chips out, well, you're out a rotor, but you confirmed the
rotor was glazed and better that it happened on the brake lathe
than on the road.

Just my .03
 
Locking front brakes... not generally a good idea, as the resulting pavement contact hurts.
Fingers need to know to let off some pressure instantly. Stopping hard requires practice.
The ability to lock the brakes is very important. Newer bikes have better brakes to make it easier to stop hard, less pressure required from less fingers. If a few pounds of force from two fingers will result in maximum braking possible from your tires, it is much more controllable stop than trying to get the same braking by pulling as hard as you can with all four fingers, it becomes much easier to modulate the pressure, much more accurate. Any GS would have been able to lock the wheel when it was new, now tires have gotten a lot better so some of the early single disc bikes may not be able to lock the front wheel with the best tires available today.
The dual disc ones should be able to, but not nearly as easily as it would with with newer bigger brakes.
Brake pads can get old and hard, losing some of their grip. New pads are available now which greatly increase braking effort with less finger pressure.
Discs can be glazed, hoses can be partially blocked, lots of things need to be checked.

If your brakes are not right fix them.
 
I'm kind of looking for people to say this:

"I have a GS with a soft modern tire and stock braking system and I can lock the front."

If I should be able to lock it, then I'll look into different pads and then sanding the rotors. It's not clear to me whether or not 1985 brakes (with stainless lines) should lock modern rubber.
 
Back
Top