• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Lock-up clutches

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dink
  • Start date Start date
D

Dink

Guest
After opinions on lock-up clutches,for street use.
Which one to use?Why?
Good idea?
Bad idea?
Hints Tips and Tricks?
Application is a heavily Hotted-up Katana Big bore.

Dink
 
There are two common types.
One is a slider clutch, strictly Drag race only.
The other is a Lock-up, it involves replacing the clutch hat (where the springs sit on GSX clutches) and fitting a spacer to the clutch cover.
It has levers on it that are forced in by centrifugal force, providing extrra clamping pressure to the clutch pack as revs rise,very coomonly used in "street-strip" bikes.
BTW these are the short answers.
Dink
 
I'm using the MRE. I like the mtc pressure plate with the buttons installed. I was running without the buttons and the arms dig into the aluminum pretty good. So now I'm running the mre lockup with mtc pressure plate.
 
I have only good things to say about it after a couple of years on the streets with a lockup.
There's some tinkering if you want to try out the optimal weights on the arms, but it's worth it :)

As usual, check my site for more info.
 
I have never tried one on a street bike, but do drive my bike to and back from the finish line. I am sure we talked about this a few times, so you may want to do a search.

I think it really depends on what your trying to do and what your setup is.

Pro's
You can make them very aggressive, or in my case very lazy.

You should be able to come up with a combination that prevents any slippage.

It may sound good when you bench race with your buds.

Low cost.

Con's
Takes up room.

May be much harder on the pack (depending how you set it up).

Because arm weigt is a function of tire speed and not crank speed, there is only so lite you can go with the spring load.


Remember my 0 - 30 in 1 sec video? Like Ryan said, it launches like a slider it's so soft. This is the result of about 90 pounds of static pressure. Most people will tell you to start around stock, or 200 pounds. With this setup I can pull the clutch in with my little finger and hold it. I have seen guys with door springs stuck on the arm to help overcome cable drag.
http://dickey.intell-a-sys.com/movies/clutch1.wmv

The ones I use are not very tuneable. You can play with the static and dynamic weight by changing the springs and their preload plus the weight of the arms. These were both made by MRE. You need to have buttons put into the hub if you want it to live for any length of time. Plus, without the buttons, I could see where it would tend to stick. I think you would notice this on a street bike.

I would stear you to MTC. Their snowflake would be a better setup than the MRE parts I have.
http://www.mtceng.com/clutches_lockup.htm

I wrote this stupid program to figure pack pressure.
calc.gif

dickey.intell-a-sys.com/turbo/lockup.exe

The program is built using LabView 6.1i. You will need to download the LabView runtime engine in order to run it.
http://dickey.intell-a-sys.com/496p/LVRunTimeEng.msi
http://dickey.intell-a-sys.com/496p/lvanlys.dll

clutch2.jpg


The RDB cover was a good investment in my case. I can pull the entire pack in about 5 minutes now. This is a big deal because I am still trying to find a sweet spot and pull the pack on every run. I should have made something like this 20 years ago.
rbd1.jpg

mc4msd6.jpg


In my case, its been difficult to balance the power / nose-dive / clutch. This years damage....
rbd3.jpg
 
Lecroy is it a case of you can buy the buttons to install to the clutch hat? Or do you need to buy a hat as well?
Dink
 
MTC Part#
CC506 GS1100 Pressure Plate with buttons

If you have the equipment available, you could make your own setup. I would shy away from it just because of the time. I have not seen anyone offering the buttons. But, I would think they would sell you a set if you really wanted to go this route.

I was going to mention that you are correct ...

"The other is a Lock-up, it involves replacing the clutch hat (where the springs sit on GSX clutches) and fitting a spacer to the clutch cover. "

When you use the stock clutch cover, you need the spacer. However, with the RDB cover, this goes away. There are a few things about the cover. The oil cap is the smaller (more common) size. In my case I had to adapt the return line with a custom part.

oilcap1.jpg


The basket sets in a bit far so you need to stuff a rag between the hub and cover to make sure you don't drop anything when you pull it apart.

rbd4.jpg


For a streetbike, I am not sure why you would want to put a lockup on. My old GS will spin that little tire long before the clutch gives out.
 
Lock up Clutch

Lock up Clutch

I agree,unless the bike does more track duty than street.A good set of fibers(EBC kevlar),good condition steel plates(I like to glass bead them),and heavy duty springs,will hold up to more than the rear tire will.The lock up will improve your 60' times at the track,but will be loose on the street when you hop on it at low rpm. Steve
 
I had slipping problems and sure, HD springs fixed it.
However, the stiff clutch made riding around town an agony, left arm aching at stops. Not a problem at the tracks :wink:
Switching to a lockup and standard springs made all the difference, try it !
As I mostly ride on the streets I chose standard springs to avoid slippage at low rpm:s.
If I were to drag race I'd use lighter/fewer springs to get suitable slippage off the start line.

Yes, it's an expensive solution, but like welding the cank I consider it an insurance for the future.
Whatever I decide to do with my engine I know I've got the clutch sorted :)
 
I put a lockup on my street bike. I machined lockup unit and made my own buttons for it. Only two noticable differences. One, the clutch is very hard to pull in at speed, the arms keep it locked up. Two, with the spacer and having to move the clutch cable it's harder to get it into neutral with the engine running. The 1150 seems to be very sensitive to cable location. You move it and it dosen't want to go into neutral at idle, not fun for street riding. My two cents. Mike J
 
I don't have any problems with my lockup.

What kind of power output do you have?
Have you tried removing weights from the arms?

With correct clutch cable adjustment a difficult neutral sounds more like a warped plate... :)
 
I've an MTC lockup on my street-turbo GS1168.

Because the full torque with a VNT turbo comes in at 3500rpm already, I had to fit all the weigth that could be fitted onto the arms, fitted 6 HD springs, an extra steel plate and now it holds the 200 Nm. I can still pull the clutch in at high engine speeds, works very well.

Marco.
image036.jpg
 
Its about time you joined in!!!!

Now that we have the MTC expert with us (your the only person I know that is using one), I have a VERY simple question for you.

With the MRE clutchs I have the pack pressure is a function of arm weight and RPM so you can not change the overall shape of the curve. You can fine tune how the weight is added by using different combinations of weights on everyother arm, or change the static force, but not the shape.

I am under the impression that the arms on the MTC clutch you have can use a counter balance spring to determine at what RPM the weight starts to add pressure to the pack. I am under the impression that you can purchase different counter balance springs for it. This would allow you to do almost anything you want with tuning. Not quite as complex as the no transmission fuelers, but compared to the MRE, very flexible.

Also, the spacer you are using looks like my MRE spacers. Could you do me a favor and measure the width of it.

Thanks
 
THat looks like the 2 stage and not the multi stage. It works the same as our does. I had talked to MTC about the multi stage at the Norwalk Prostar race. I was looking for more adjustability. I've heard if you don't have a data recorder you can forget it. That came from a guy with the multi stage on his busa dragbike.
 
I have not seen the multi-stage up close. Just pictures on their site. Looking at the top two, it looks like the two are the same. I just assumed the only difference was one was shipped without the springs.

I agree with you. A logger is the only way to go. I saw that one MPS has one with just the two speed inputs for under $600.
http://www.mpsracing.com/products/RPM/datalogger.asp
This is about all you would need to set one up.

I'm sticking with my home made logger from hell. I need to shrink it down and make it open design. Without the sensors, I think I could make a kit available for under $100. Let people do their own thing with it.
http://dickey.intell-a-sys.com/logger3.html
test3.jpg

cluster.jpg
 
I would love a logger that just did rpm. Really see what the clutch is doing. Would make tuning really easy. The mps unit is way too rich for my blood.

Could you set up your data logger to do rpm using the tach output from the schnitz box. You can set the output to either 1 or 2 output signals per revolution.
 
I would love a logger that just did rpm. Really see what the clutch is doing. Would make tuning really easy. The mps unit is way too rich for my blood.

My first goal of this was to make something that people could use as a real tool and change it to fit their needs. Not like all the $1000 - $10000
systems I was looking at, most with 10Hz sample rates and 8 bits of resolution. My second goal was to make it so most people could afford it.
Sort of like the whole MegaSquirt EFI project. The nice thing is that the logger is VERY VERY simple compared to an EFI. I think the program that runs it is maybe 50 lines of C code right now. Because I used all open sourced tools to develop the unit, anyone can download them and make changes.

There was not much interest in it. So for now I am spending time making my prototype better.

Could you set up your data logger to do rpm using the tach output from the schnitz box. You can set the output to either 1 or 2 output signals per revolution.
It seems that if the ignition guys did one thing right, it was the tach signal. The Dyna SP 4000, MC-2 and my MC-4 all work the same. Because they need to work with other equipment like RPM switches, tachometers, shift lights and such they all seem to follow a standard. So, yes it will work.

To give you an idea of what you could see using a simple two channel logger, this first graph is the clutch slippage in percent. The logger knows the crank speed from the tach and measures the output shaft speed using a sensor. You enter all of your data about your engine and the program then knows what the ratio of the two should be. If the engine is spining at 1000 RPM and the output shaft is not moving, it's a good indication that the clutch is not engaged, or zero percent.
cg1.jpg

Two very interesting things about this graph. From the time I released the button to the time the clutch starts to engage is 0.6 seconds. Then it takes another 0.5 seconds to fully engage. But even more strange is the funny shape. It's not smooth like you would expect. And you thought my one video clip was soft!! LOL This was me playing with a restrictor on the output of the air cylinder to slow the release to try and keep the nose up. It would be like you letting your clutch lever out slow. The air ram chatters when I do this causing the oscillations. Even though I could tune for the delay, it was not consistant at all and caused the steel plates to get hot spots.
plate6.jpg


So I dropped this idea and started experimenting with lower static pressures. So, same bike, engine, tire, etc. No restrictor and very low spring force with a lot of arm mass.
cg2.jpg

Notice now that when I release the button, the clutch starts to engage after 0.05 seconds and is fully engaged after 0.22 seconds. More important is the shape.

cg3.jpg

The clutch gets to about 30% (slope A) and stays there for about 0.07 seconds doing a nice slip until the massive weights start to kick in (slope B). This keeps the shock down, tire from spinning and I would suspect allow the bike to run at Norwalk, or in my driveway with about the same results. This is the data from the last driveway video clip BTW. This seems to also solve the hot spot problem.

The next step would be to start pushing slope B back to slope A to get the bike to react faster. The only problem is if you push things too far you get something like this.
cg5.jpg

This is a graph of the output shaft in MPH. Now my engine tuning is not good enough to ever win me an award, but it sure is not so bad that it's causing this. So softer is slower, but it sure beats a 10" 4.5PSI bouncing ball. But then again, a little better driveway prep would go a long way to help this out. I need to buy some VHT for home use.

Ok, one last thing before closing the book on this subject. So, I can plot two shaft speeds in MPH, RPM, frequency, or take a ratio of the two there is one other interesting thing. This last graph shows how the bike accelerates. This graph is showing the change in output shaft RPM every 0.01 seconds. Anything greater than zero and the bike is speeding up, anything negative and the bike is slowing down.
cg4.jpg

You can see how it starts out nice and smooth then things start to get a little funny. At 5.2 seconds into the run the bike actually starts to slow down. Notice the bottom graph is showing boost pressure in PSIG. Notice that every time the bike shifts, the boost pressure rolls off. My bike uses a stock transmission so I kill on every shift for 0.05 seconds. Notice that the negative spike in the first graph happens after the bike shifts. The tire spun. We could see that the tire was not holding the track very well anyway prior to it giving way. Of course, higher pressures and we are making a tad bit more power.

Ok, the question should be how do I know the tire slipped and not the clutch. Well this is the whole point of the logger. I can plot the clutch slippage as before and see. If the clutch is not slipping, then it must be the tire.

Well, hope it at least gives you an idea of what you could do with two speed sensors and a logger if you did not know already. I get a lot of laughs with all of the electronics on my old bike.
 
Hi Lecroy,
Sorry, I never considered my amateur imput to be of value to you.

It was sold to me as a 2-stage lockup. I completely mucked up the 2 stage as I had to put max weight on all arms ofcourse. It is not meant to be fitted with springs as std., but I see how you could do that. Needs some experimenting, but as I see you are the ''science-boi'' here this couldn't be a problem for you, could it? :wink:

The spacer is at the welder at the mo to have a neat oilreturn made into it, when it's back I'll measure the width for you.

Greetz, Marco.
 
marcovandevelde said:
Hi Lecroy,
Sorry, I never considered my amateur imput to be of value to you.

I am sorry if I wrote something to make you feel this way. I consider myself an amateur at best. I would consider myself the waterboy on a football team, except I get to play with the ball once in a while. Helping out as a pit guy has really taught me a lot about the sport. I even pick good pointers from the kid. He is a natural. If we could just get him interested in setting up his own bikes.

marcovandevelde said:
It was sold to me as a 2-stage lockup. I completely mucked up the 2 stage as I had to put max weight on all arms ofcourse. It is not meant to be fitted with springs as std., but I see how you could do that. Needs some experimenting, but as I see you are the ''science-boi'' here this couldn't be a problem for you, could it? :wink:

It would be interesting to see the two (multi and 2 stage units). You could add more weight by the looks of it. On my bike, this can cause problems as well. Everytime I play with a clutch it seems to be a balancing act to get it right. I would love to spend a weekend at a real race on a T/F team just to see how they tune them.

I wanted to add a return line to the new cover and just use the stock oil cap but there was just no room. The oil cap works good and does not look too bad on the bike so I plan to just leave it.
 
Back
Top