• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Spring question ?

I've read it all three ways:

1. Tight ends down
2. Loose ends down
3. Doesn't matter, as long as you're consistent between the two

I'd suggest that 3 is probably right, but I installed mine tight winds down at the suggestion they make less noise that way. How does the spring appear on the fiche?
 
Last edited:
On the fiche it appears there are no tight ends. At least you didn't tell me the spring was shot. I will do it as you say. Tight end down.
 
Its a progressive wound spring, as long as its the same on both sides it will be just fine. Heck may not even mater if they weren't the same but it makes sense to make them the same.
 
It really does not matter. The windings that are further apart will always compress first, and their movement is limited to along the length of the shock. However, if you do one of each expect tol get razzed by bike riders that know what to look for. I always put the closer windings on the top, btw.
 
i would fit it with the tighter coils up the top. have you bought a new stronger spring, if so where from?
 
as with any progressive spring.

the rule to remember is that the (tighter) progressive windings are placed at the stationary end. There is always movement anywhere there is spring. the wide windings go where the movement is initiated.

so for convential forks the tight windings are up top. for valve springs they are against the head.
 
your right steve,
A Progressive spring is not the same as a Dual-Rate Spring. A progressive-wound spring is similar to a dual-rate in that it has an initial and final rate. The drawback of a progressive spring is that the crossover point is not adjustable. How the spring is wound determines the characteristics of the spring. This type of spring is wound with a varying pitch, as opposed to a constant pitch used in linear rate springs. One end has greater distance between the coils than at the other end of the spring. As the coils compress the coils closest to each other touch, (become coil-bound), which effectively reduces the number of active coils. As the number of active coils reduce the spring rate rises or becomes stiffer. Depending on shaft travel of a particular shock, an inappropriate progressive spring can actually cross over the initial rate in pre-load, or not attain the final rate at all. Progressive-wound springs can be a compromise if they are not designed for the specific application
 
Yes I have, and there is a huge difference. But bear in mind. There wasn't much oil left in the fork, and what was there was 28 year old sludge. But even with my weight I am happy. Put 11 lb.'s of air in, and may bump that up. And I think 20 wt. would have stiffened them a bit more. Refer to my other thread { 20 wt. Fork oil ? }
 
Yes I have, and there is a huge difference. But bear in mind. There wasn't much oil left in the fork, and what was there was 28 year old sludge. But even with my weight I am happy. Put 11 lb.'s of air in, and may bump that up. And I think 20 wt. would have stiffened them a bit more. Refer to my other thread { 20 wt. Fork oil ? }
Just remember that 20w oil does not hold up the bike or keep the suspension from bottoming.

It only slows down the response to keep it from bottoming as quickly.

I read some tech articles on suspension from a race mechanic, and he suggested using the lightest weight oil that would do the job of damping. Yeah, different bikes, different spring rates, different riders, different tracks all required their own settings for oil level and viscosity, but his theory was to use proper springs to hold the bike up and light oil to keep them damped.

.
 
Sorry, I have no intention of changing the oil. Was just commenting on what I would do if I was doing the job now. I think I would have put those Progressive springs in as well. But at the time I didn't want to wait or spend the money.
 
Really? :-k

I thought that the tight ones compressed first. :confused:

.

Actually, all the coils compress together, but the tighter end coil binds first, reducing the effective length of the spring and making it stiffer.
The spring has no idea which end it's being compressed from, the only advantage to putting the tighter coils up top is that reduces unsprung weight by a tiny amount. Completely insignificant effect in a motorcycle fork.
Put them in with the tight end up, down, mixed, whatever, you'll never feel a difference.
 
Actually, all the coils compress together, but the tighter end coil binds first, reducing the effective length of the spring and making it stiffer.
The spring has no idea which end it's being compressed from, the only advantage to putting the tighter coils up top is that reduces unsprung weight by a tiny amount. Completely insignificant effect in a motorcycle fork.
Put them in with the tight end up, down, mixed, whatever, you'll never feel a difference.
how does it do that then? considering the springs are part of the mechanics that all the unsprung weight is attatched to! :confused:
 
how does it do that then? considering the springs are part of the mechanics that all the unsprung weight is attatched to! :confused:

The top of the spring is 100% sprung weight, the bottom of it is 100% unsprung. A linear spring has its weight evenly distributed over its length, so 50% of the weight is unsprung. A progressively wound spring has a heavy end though, the one with the tighter coil winding. So if you install it with that end down you might end up with 60% of the total weight being unsprung.
A pair of springs weighs around 35ozs, so 10% of that is 3.5ozs. Compared to the weight of the wheel, tire, brake disks, calipers, fork sliders etc. that's insignificant, less than 1%. Ergo, it doesn't matter which end goes up. :)
 
Back
Top