Supersprox stealth

[Cipher]

Has anyone used this type of hybrid steel\aluminum sprocket?

 

[Buffalo Bill]

I thought this would be about a new super infectious smallpox, bio warfare weapon?

 

[Steve]

No, have never had the need for this "sprocket" thing since April of 1979. :-\\\

.

 

[Cipher]

I read a lot on this it seems its marketing hype. Minimal weight loss overall plus a seriously compromised sprocket.
Stell it is for me and none of the nonsense 520. Good old God-fearing 530 and OEM steel. Had the last set on for 35 000 miles with religious clean\oil cycles.
3-4 pounds of unsprung weight shaved cannot be wortht eh price or hassle.

 

[SVSooke]

I read a lot on this it seems its marketing hype. Minimal weight loss overall plus a seriously compromised sprocket.
Stell it is for me and none of the nonsense 520. Good old God-fearing 530 and OEM steel. Had the last set on for 35 000 miles with religious clean\oil cycles.
3-4 pounds of unsprung weight shaved cannot be wortht eh price or hassle.

That's what I read some where to,best to go OEM (usually Sunstar)or JT.I've had good luck with JT sprockets to.

 

[tkent02]

Couple of my dirt bikes have had them. They come in orange or red whatever you flavor of bike is. They last as long as steel, probably lighter but I never took one off to weigh it.

 

[Guest]

I read a lot on this it seems its marketing hype. Minimal weight loss overall plus a seriously compromised sprocket.
Stell it is for me and none of the nonsense 520. Good old God-fearing 530 and OEM steel. Had the last set on for 35 000 miles with religious clean\oil cycles.
3-4 pounds of unsprung weight shaved cannot be wortht eh price or hassle.

It depends on what you are doing. For our heavy, old-tech suspension, bias ply tired machines it isn't even a detectable difference. For lighter, faster machines with quality suspension on a track then losing unsprung, rotating weight is absolutely worth it.


Mark

 

[bwringer]

Very, very little weight difference for the money.

Even on a very light dirtbike, the only real benefit is that it looks sorta cool.

 

[GS1150Pilot]

I dunno. Certainly a 530 swap is a plus, given SS Mag's findings regarding a 530 to 520 swap. Not sure whether the further reductions in weight make a difference, but they may.

"When the smoke cleared and the averages were calculated, the Ninja 1000 gained 1.5 HP and 1.4 LB-FT at the rear wheel and knocked off .05 seconds in the 25-125 MPH fourth gear dyno acceleration test."

http://www.superstreetbike.com/how-to/does-520-chain-conversion-increase-horsepower-mythbusters

 

[Cipher]

.05??? pretty awful net gain

 

[Guest]

I dunno. Certainly a 530 swap is a plus, given SS Mag's findings regarding a 530 to 520 swap. Not sure whether the further reductions in weight make a difference, but they may.

"When the smoke cleared and the averages were calculated, the Ninja 1000 gained 1.5 HP and 1.4 LB-FT at the rear wheel and knocked off .05 seconds in the 25-125 MPH fourth gear dyno acceleration test."

http://www.superstreetbike.com/how-to/does-520-chain-conversion-increase-horsepower-mythbusters

They probably would have done better with a comparison of o-ring to conventional chain. Unsprung weight is much more of an issue on a light bike, but that doesn't really apply to our heavy, old-tech machines.


Mark

 

[GS1150Pilot]

I'll take 1 or 2 free hp and lb ft any day of the week when it comes to replacing worn parts with no compromise. My 1150 runs a 530 conversion. I'd never go back.

 

[tkent02]

Even on a very light dirtbike, the only real benefit is that it looks sorta cool.

Yep, except when damn near everyone has one.

 

[Guest]

Joe Whelan's 1100ez used them and they are attractive. Maybe more form than function. Rob Wilton was another proponent .