A
Anonymous
Guest
I posted a while back about a bizzarre timing problem -- I was adjusting the timing on my '79 GS550L using a strobe, but was unable to line up the appropriate marks because the adjusment slots seemed "too short".
Anyway, someone at a scrap yard suggested to me last weekend that it might be a problem with the point gap. It seems that if the gap is made too large, this shows up as an advance in the timing. If the gap is made smaller, the timing is retarded.
I had set the gap to the high end of spec, because I thought it would be beneficial for the points to be as far as possible from each other when they weren't in contact.
To resolve the problem, I made the gap smaller, closer to the low end of spec. Without making any other changes, I was able to watch the timing fall back each time I adjusted the points closer.
I guess the lesson is, timing is affected by BOTH the gap and the position of the plates. Sound right?
Michael
Anyway, someone at a scrap yard suggested to me last weekend that it might be a problem with the point gap. It seems that if the gap is made too large, this shows up as an advance in the timing. If the gap is made smaller, the timing is retarded.
I had set the gap to the high end of spec, because I thought it would be beneficial for the points to be as far as possible from each other when they weren't in contact.
To resolve the problem, I made the gap smaller, closer to the low end of spec. Without making any other changes, I was able to watch the timing fall back each time I adjusted the points closer.
I guess the lesson is, timing is affected by BOTH the gap and the position of the plates. Sound right?
Michael