• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

What the Fork is Going On?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kodak
  • Start date Start date
K

Kodak

Guest
Hey all,

Intro thread is soon to come once I upload all the images! I acquired my first bike, 1980 Suzuki Gs850G with extras, and am in the process of going through the basics outlined in BikeCliffs website. I'm currently working on the fork seals and changing out that god forsaken smell of fork oil. I notice one of my forks at the end of the tube doesn't look like the other one which does look like the one in the fork seal replacement guide from BikeCliffs website. Additionally I noticed this fork had an internal metal ring within the fork seal which I had to cut out. Am I dealing with two different fork models and is this a problemo??
Edit: The forks are the same length, same spring length, and seemingly same external design

Rv6MWQ1.jpg


mpNnZZF.jpg
 
Last edited:
The fork with the bush is probably from a later model GS. Not sure which models / when exactly they started using them but my 84 750EF and 85 1150 both had forks with the bushes.

I'd guess the PO changed it out because the old fork was bent or pitted. A lot of the GS's had 37mm forks so changing them around was pretty easy.
 
The bike came with an extra set of forks, I did notice they had some surface rust, but I'll check for how true they are tonight. I'm guessing the advice would be to put the proper fork tube in. Or is this a setup that can work? I can't see how it wouldn't effect suspension in some way.
 
The fork with the bush is probably from a later model GS. Not sure which models / when exactly they started using them but my 84 750EF and 85 1150 both had forks with the bushes.

All of the 16 valve 1100's (1980 on) use a bushing on the bottom of the fork leg as well.


Mark
 
So are they interchangeable and in this case any different to the 1980 GS850 fork style?

Doesn't look like it. According to Partzilla the 1980 850 fork tube is only used on the 79-81 850G and 1000G: http://www.partzilla.com/parts/detail/suzuki/SP-51110-45100.html

The 82-83 1100E fork is different than the 80-81 fork and none of them are the same part number. As hillsy says, there were a lot of 37mm forks and it may be hard to pin down which one you have there. If you use partzilla you can do some cross checking and find out what part numbers span what years and models, but that is all I have.


Mark
 
I would say that they would both operate in the same manner and that there would be no problem using the set up as is.

That extra metal ring is a replaceable bush that presumably was added to later models to improve the wear characteristics of the fork leg.
 
The 82-83 1100E fork is different than the 80-81 fork and none of them are the same part number.

Right. 82E-83E's have the damping adjusters and the anti-dive units. The left fork in your first pic is not a 82E or 83E
 
Right. 82E-83E's have the damping adjusters and the anti-dive units. The left fork in your first pic is not a 82E or 83E

So what I'm working with is an 80-81 1100 fork? Might have to find its match, do people successfully run 1100 forks on 850 frames? Seeing as they are the same diameter and length, is it safe to assume the upgrade in bushing design was the only important difference?
I would say that they would both operate in the same manner and that there would be no problem using the set up as is.

That extra metal ring is a replaceable bush that presumably was added to later models to improve the wear characteristics of the fork leg.

I suppose that the previous owner didn't notice an issue! After I take the rust of the other set of forks which I know to be 850 forks and see their condition I will end up ditching the 1100 fork.
 
Last edited:

I suppose that the previous owner didn't notice an issue!
Just check the total uncompressed length and compare. I nearly got caught out by making an assumption that GS1000 legs were the same as GS850, but the 1000 ones are ~17mm shorter. It worked out ok, though. If you're lucky, the 1100 legs might be overall the same length as the 850. If they are, it gives me something to look for. I will watch this thread with interest.
Regarding the Left to Right differences on your bike as you got it from the PO, it probably functioned fine. After all, some makers have been known to fit odd match legs from side to side and nobody seemed to notice. Rebound damping only on one side, that kind of thing. If the fork brace is stout enough it would work ok, but personally I would try to keep them matched as close as reasonably possible. Given the imperfections of design of the basic telescopic fork, it's a wonder it works at all and doesn't spit people off into the scenery more often.
 
Back
Top