• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

78 GS1000 side covers

  • Thread starter Thread starter SVSooke
  • Start date Start date

78 GS1000 side covers

  • Matte

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • Gloss

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
S

SVSooke

Guest
Been thinking on my options for the side covers on my 78 1000 project.As best I know they came from the factory in a matte finish.Thinking of doing them in a satin black or gloss to match the "skunk" paint I'm planning to put on.Opinions?
 
I'm thinking gloss black, like this one.

1978_GS1000E_ad1_450.jpg
 
If your build is a restoration, I think matte is the proper choice. If you are modding the bike significantly then choose what suites your eye.
 
Youll probably clean them and wax to keep the water stains down and make bugs easier to remove...which will make them shiney anyways, so why not just gloss them and go from there???
 
If your build is a restoration, I think matte is the proper choice. If you are modding the bike significantly then choose what suites your eye.

I'm confused. That ad is the original ad in 1978. They sure look glossy to me ?? But I've never seen one up close.
 
Just my opinion based on Larry pointing out that the nice shiney tank and dull side covers REALLY clash. He was right, of course. You slap semi or matte on there and your gonna just rip them off and redo them.
 
I think the "regular" base model had matte.
I think the "E" had gloss.

Mine is an E with the original matte side covers.
I love em! I think the entire bike would look good to match.
 
Youll probably clean them and wax to keep the water stains down and make bugs easier to remove...which will make them shiney anyways, so why not just gloss them and go from there???

Waxing the original matte side cover will not make em shiny. One of mine had pretty bad stains on em and I tried everything to clean em up, even wax. I think it may have beed battery spilage.
Ended up soaking the stained area with Goo Gone. Only thing that worked.
 
If your build is a restoration, I think matte is the proper choice. If you are modding the bike significantly then choose what suites your eye.
Not really a restoration.Mostly stock with long Dunstalls in place of rusted out stockers I got from AZR.E forks and brakes from Chuck and Dale,thanks again guys.See the Skunk thread in my sig for more.

Youll probably clean them and wax to keep the water stains down and make bugs easier to remove...which will make them shiney anyways, so why not just gloss them and go from there???

Just my opinion based on Larry pointing out that the nice shiney tank and dull side covers REALLY clash. He was right, of course. You slap semi or matte on there and your gonna just rip them off and redo them.
Might have a point but I'm not quite as sure.

I think the "regular" base model had matte.
I think the "E" had gloss.
Wondered about this but.........
I like shiny ;):

DSC07032.jpg


Daniel
A year changes things Daniel.I like shiny to.Trying to be sure what is stock then going from there.

Mine is an E with the original matte side covers.
I love em! I think the entire bike would look good to match.
This is where my but came from.Oh I hate all matte bikes,just saying.
 
The bike that I posted is number 777 of the 1978 model year production. ;)

Daniel
 
I like gloss carbon fiber side covers..

Maybe after the weather warms up. :cool:
 
The '78 GS1000E frame covers I think were more of a matte, semi-gloss, not the real high gloss as they weren't painted. You can clearly see the difference in the shinyness in this photo when you compare them to the tank and tail piece.
scan0002.jpg


The '79 GS1000E frame covers were the same except for the emblems. I had mine painted high gloss black, quite a difference from the original and yes it matches the tank and tail, not a big deal either way though, more of a matter of personal preference.
100_1271.jpg
 
I'm confused. That ad is the original ad in 1978. They sure look glossy to me ?? But I've never seen one up close.

The bike in that add is a prototype you think, check out the seat grab rail, not the one they put into production is it? So, I wouldn't take what's in that add as gospel. Since I owned one I know they weren't very glossy.
 
They are semi-gloss black complete with factory orange peel.

IMG_2587.jpg
 
OK stock is not matte but more of a satin black.That would be my choice IF I go that way.I can see going either way.Hmmm......
 
Back
Top