• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Solid State Power Box

Very interesting and a brilliant idea!

Just a question or two:

Will your unit have any sort of warning when a circuit has been automatically cut due to a short?
I had a Harley here with a short to ground in the handlebar switch and the audible ticking of the 15A auto fuse was an immediate clue.

Lets say you have installed it in place of a 5 fuse unit, will there be an indication as to which circuit is switched out during a fault?

Will you have any manual method of isolating a "fused" circuit to allow easy fault finding? Based on pulling a fuse.
Sorry just saw your post.

You are correct in needing some feedback . I tested the prototype and with bike running and all lights on I grounded the switched ACC output and nothing outwardly appears to happen. The smart FET detects the condition within 200 us limiting current and then going into a cyclic thermal shutdown recycle.

The smart FETs have a status indication which I have tied to the flashing red LED. Given the SSPB will be added under a side cover I looking at adding a small buzzer that can be disabled by a jumper under the cover.

I've put together a FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) matrix for various faults/failures am still working through fail safes and " walking wounded" modes for getting you back home without needing a soldering iron in the event a FET fails open. I've added additional SMD fuses (non replaceable) as a back up to the smart FET controls in case of a fail short. So there should be full protection against any type of fault with or without the external inline fuse.

I realize the importance of such a device to the safety and reliability of your motor cycle perhaps more critical than any other. The PCB will be we'll protected beyond what is already built in for a robust automotive grade parts.

I don't see any particular sensitivities that the unit will have and don't see anything that would give an abnormal failure rate. It should at at least S reliable as any MOSFET or SERIES r/r realizing that most all r/r fail due to poor connections. A big part of this design is go eliminate connections that can make you susceptible to corrosion . Preliminary calculations are that the power dissipation should be low (less than 10 watts at full capacity ). There should be no more than about 0.25V drop at 14.5V 20 amps

One of the things I'm working on at the moment is how to easily revert back to a
Running off the ignition switch with fused circuits if FET failed open. This the least likely failure mode but not a situation you want to be faced with without some limp home strategy.

Should be able to selectively override each FET circuit which I think also satisfies your diagnostic criteria.
 
Last edited:
Sorry just saw your post.

You are correct in needing some feedback . I tested the prototype and with bike running and all lights on I grounded the switched ACC output and nothing outwardly appears to happen. The smart FET detects the condition within 200 us limiting current and then going into a cyclic thermal shutdown recycle.

The smart FETs have a status indication which I have tied to the flashing red LED. Given the SSPB will be added under a side cover I looking at adding a small buzzer that can be disabled by a jumper under the cover.

I've put together a FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) matrix for various faults/failures am still working through fail safes and " walking wounded" modes for getting you back home without needing a soldering iron in the event a FET fails open. I've added additional SMD fuses (non replaceable) as a back up to the smart FET controls in case of a fail short. So there should be full protection against any type of fault with or without the external inline fuse.

I realize the importance of such a device to the safety and reliability of your motor cycle perhaps more critical than any other. The PCB will be we'll protected beyond what is already built in for a robust automotive grade parts.

I don't see any particular sensitivities that the unit will have and don't see anything that would give an abnormal failure rate. It should at at least S reliable as any MOSFET or SERIES r/r realizing that most all r/r fail due to poor connections. A big part of this design is go eliminate connections that can make you susceptible to corrosion . Preliminary calculations are that the power dissipation should be low (less than 10 watts at full capacity ). There should be no more than about 0.25V drop at 14.5V 20 amps

One of the things I'm working on at the moment is how to easily revert back to a
Running off the ignition switch with fused circuits if FET failed open. This the least likely failure mode but not a situation you want to be faced with without some limp home strategy.

Should be able to selectively override each FET circuit which I think also satisfies your diagnostic criteria.

Hi Jim,
Thanks for the feedback. The issue around the size or footprint and the hardware (enclosure, mounting and connectors) can sometimes be bigger challenge than the actual electronic design!

The status led and audible warning will eventually determine how user friendly your unit will be, regardless of the sophistication of the insides.
Your first clients will probably buy it as they understand what you are doing, others later on will not care as long as it does the job, which will include indicating clearly what is wrong if something goes wrong.

Individual circuit led's should indicate which circuit is faulty and the audible should not be annoying otherwise it will just be permanently disabled. Consider a slow beep or slow ticking sound. I suggest a miniature led for each circuit, let it flash with the thermal cycle of the Fet.

You could consider backing up the circuits with miniature auto fuses, which can override a failed open Fet when plugged in. If you use a 3 way socket per fuse one way could be fuse in serial and pulled for disabling a cicuit manually and the other position in parallel to bridge the Fet...? If you bridge the Fet the individual status led should also come on to indicate this.

I assume that the ignition switch will not carry heavy current anymore and just switch on the Fets. Thus your highest calculation for voltage drop being 0.25V should be a major improvement on what we have now via the mechanical parts.

I like your idea! How about designing one for fault finding? It would be great tool to have something like this you can just plug into a fuse position to find a short circuit or even an intermittent short blowing a fuse, without having a handful of blown fuses at the end.:)
 
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the feedback. The issue around the size or footprint and the hardware (enclosure, mounting and connectors) can sometimes be bigger challenge than the actual electronic design!

Yep the connector is one of the biggest compromises. The contacts are rated at 10 amps and as long as the main current comes in on the discrete wires it is OK. Will need a little fiddling to come in on the bottom but workable,

The status led and audible warning will eventually determine how user friendly your unit will be, regardless of the sophistication of the insides.
Your first clients will probably buy it as they understand what you are doing, others later on will not care as long as it does the job, which will include indicating clearly what is wrong if something goes wrong.

The RED LED flashes and that in concert with a two tone beep should be enough to detect a n issue when the engine is off but side over on. I might add a through hole pads in case someone wants to run an LED off the dash purely as an option . I was not planning on supplying an extra LED or wire for that through.

Individual circuit led's should indicate which circuit is faulty and the audible should not be annoying otherwise it will just be permanently disabled. Consider a slow beep or slow ticking sound. I suggest a miniature led for each circuit, let it flash with the thermal cycle of the Fet.

It is a small place and I don't want to make it too technical specially with automatic fault isolation. It is easy enough to determine of the engine will not crank, start , headlamps not on or tail lights blinker not operating without needing LED under the side cover. So for no I have just settled on one power LED, green and one status LED RED flashing when there is a fault detected.

You could consider backing up the circuits with miniature auto fuses, which can override a failed open Fet when plugged in. If you use a 3 way socket per fuse one way could be fuse in serial and pulled for disabling a cicuit manually and the other position in parallel to bridge the Fet...? If you bridge the Fet the individual status led should also come on to indicate this.

I am concerned amount either having a failure and causing a short in the harness; that just is not acceptable. Leaving someone stranded in the case of an internal fault, is not really an option. Many problems that will originate in the electrical system, will have to be dealt with bu the owner. The SSPB can only provide a heads up that something is going on. Putting blade fuses into the design would make it much larger and begs the question of what is the point if getting rid of them was the original concept in the first place.?


I assume that the ignition switch will not carry heavy current anymore and just switch on the Fets. Thus your highest calculation for voltage drop being 0.25V should be a major improvement on what we have now via the mechanical parts.

There should be only a few milli amps through the ignition switch , except in a "wakling wounded mode" , where you can revert back to using the ignition switch to power the bike in the event of an partial of full failure of the internal SSPB FETs.

I like your idea! How about designing one for fault finding? It would be great tool to have something like this you can just plug into a fuse position to find a short circuit or even an intermittent short blowing a fuse, without having a handful of blown fuses at the end.:)

Yes you could easily design a tested light for detecting shorts, but the not sure how much better it would be that disconnecting the battery and using an ohm meter.



More later :)
 
This has been great to follow along. I wish I knew more about the technical specifics but am learning a few things anyway. I am eagerly awaiting the final product.
 
Bump; I provided an update to the first page of this thread along with a downloadable functional diagram, Comments welcome. I'm getting pretty close to sending out to have the PCB's made so now is the time for any comments and changes.http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showpost.php?p=1887048&postcount=1

I had a quick look there and just the following:

The SSPB will have two LED's and a Buzzer to provide feedback to you about what is going on inside. When the Ignition Switch is powered on you will see the GREEN LED come on. This is indicating that the unit is receiving power and the IGNITION switch signal. In the event that there is a FAULT, then a RED LED will flash and a Buzzer will sound indicating the presence of the fault. This will ocuur even if the Ignition switch is off and the GREEN LED is off. Once you are aware of the FAULT you should fix the problem. But it will be possible to open the SSPB cover and disable the buzzer. You will not be able to disable the RED LED however. There will also be a provision for connecting a handlebar mounted WARNING LED if you like.

I think having an alarm indication even with ignition off is going to cause problems. Some people may park the bike for a long time in disgust and with the intention of getting to it some time. Will the unit have any current draw when the ignition is switched off? Any current draw with ignition off in normal or fault mode should be avoided even if only a few mA.

OK a LOT of people have issues with buzzers (that irritating ding dong in some cars!) on motorcycles, so rather make the buzzer only work at ignition switchon and time out after 10 seconds. The circuit if not attended to, will stay tripped out like a blown or pulled fuse and the rider could probably use the bike as he would have done before, with just a quick reminder at startup only.

I presume the Description and Operation note at the moment is just temporary. In you final operation/user manual I sugets you ad a section called Optional Enhancements or something like that. Here you can add the details for adding/converting to the Ignition Relay modification, headlamp cut out relay modification and the switched accessory jumper configuration.
This part as it is now included will cause a lot of confusion and make your unit seem unnecessary complicated. Reading and seeing it separately as an option will make the basic written guide seem simpler and easier.

I like the idea of the fuses in series with the solid state fuse as this gives an option to isolate a circuit manually for faulting. I assume your electronic fuse set at 10A will trip faster than the 10A standard fuse? Or you may have a 15A rather as the secondary backup to the 10A electronic one?

Good work you are doing here, very interesting, best of luck.
 
Hi. I am not here. I am studying for my new job. Just looked quickly at the extra pages since I last logged in. I am interested in two units. But I would need to know the initial batch cost. Daniel

I'm still looking at $150 per unit, the length of the warranty is TBD at the moment. I'm toying with lifetime (repair or replace) warranty for original owner but don't really know how badly this can be abused.

The device should be very robust and not subject to failures under normal or moderately abused care. A direct lighting strike would probably kill it. Many of the other devices (Ignitors, R/R's) would fail first
 
Put me down for one too. I think its a great idea, and would go well with Rick's stator and the SH-775.
 
I had a quick look there and just the following:



I think having an alarm indication even with ignition off is going to cause problems. Some people may park the bike for a long time in disgust and with the intention of getting to it some time. Will the unit have any current draw when the ignition is switched off? Any current draw with ignition off in normal or fault mode should be avoided even if only a few mA.

If the alarm is going off then then there is an issue that should be attended to. I did not measure the thermal duty cycle , but the switch limits at 12 amps for about 200 uSec and then shuts off. It is probably something like 1% duty cycle so that alone is 120 mAmps draw for a shorted input.

I actually have more concern about not hearing the buzzer than it being annoying. I doubt you will hear it if you are sitting on the bike with the engine running and a helmet on. If you have reasonable hearing, then sitting on the bike with helmet but engine off you should be able to hear it. If the warning is due to anything other than the unswitched/Batt power the buzzer will probably go off with the ignition switch because power will be cut to those circuits. If it is really annoying you can always disable the buzzer, but then if you are going to ride like that I would recommend mounting a flashing warning LED on the dash.

I should note that this is a small buzzer not something like a theft alarm deterent.

The quiescent current draw will be less that 1 mAmp, probably much lkess which is far less than the self discharge rate of a typcial lead acid battery

.001 amps/14 AmpHr is C=-0.01% this is extremely low and is essentially going to be imperceptible. I'm not even sure how to measure the draw, but the spec sheets say it will be much less than 1 mAmp.

OK a LOT of people have issues with buzzers (that irritating ding dong in some cars!) on motorcycles, so rather make the buzzer only work at ignition switchon and time out after 10 seconds. The circuit if not attended to, will stay tripped out like a blown or pulled fuse and the rider could probably use the bike as he would have done before, with just a quick reminder at startup only.

This is not a key buzzer; it is a fault indicator. Generally if it is buzzing you have a short and you need to attend to it, most times this happens I could not even see continuing to ride unless it was to simply limp home. Since all circuits are protected and there is a status available, I plan to make the warning active on any fault key on or off. It may seem an irritation but from a safety and reliability stand point any fault should be dealt with immediately. There is a note in the device data sheet about repeated faults and that the device is not intended to indefinitely protect against a short like what would occur if you shorted your battery and left the bike sit for months. I don't know what the limits here are but it is one of the tests I will have to do. If draining the battery with a 30 mAmp buzzer/LED is the only way to stop the short current then that is not a bad thing.


I presume the Description and Operation note at the moment is just temporary. In you final operation/user manual I sugets you ad a section called Optional Enhancements or something like that. Here you can add the details for adding/converting to the Ignition Relay modification, headlamp cut out relay modification and the switched accessory jumper configuration.
This part as it is now included will cause a lot of confusion and make your unit seem unnecessary complicated. Reading and seeing it separately as an option will make the basic written guide seem simpler and easier.


This is not an instruction manual but a more technical/functional description of how to the device works. In fact I came to the idea of using this style of interconnect (equivalent Bosche relay) after reading both Koolaid kid's and your system relay mod write ups. When I get a unit produced I will go through the install creating descriptions with picture as I go through the process on my bike.


I like the idea of the fuses in series with the solid state fuse as this gives an option to isolate a circuit manually for faulting. I assume your electronic fuse set at 10A will trip faster than the 10A standard fuse? Or you may have a 15A rather as the secondary backup to the 10A electronic one?

These are fast blow solid state fuses intended as a fail safe in case:
  1. the owner fails to use a Battery inline fuse and a short occurs
  2. one of the smart FET's shorts high side closed and then subsequently there is a short to ground in the circuit that failed.

Otherwise these should remain in place and cant be removed without doing "brain surgery" with a soldering iron.

Good work you are doing here, very interesting, best of luck.

Thanks; it is coming along ;)
 
Entirely separate from the product you're mapping out here, I suggest you evaluate your tolerance for frustration. You're going to sell an electrical component to people whose levels of expertise and ambition span the entire spectrum. You will get a number of buyers who are inexplicably but militantly opposed to reading anything -- even anything that looks like a product description, let alone installation instructions, and it doesn't matter how thorough you are in preparing the instructions or the website, because they're not going to read them anyway.

They're out there, and they'll buy your item, and a few days later you'll start getting emails with questions that make absolutely no sense; and they'll try to install this item using some rusty arc-joint pliers and a tinner's soldering iron. And after a while, you will wonder how these people manage to dress themselves in the morning -- but they're convinced there's a problem with your product, and they want their money back.

Now, with the products I sell, I have the option to 'abort the mission' with a problem buyer by telling him to return the items, and I'll offer a full refund, just to make the headache go away, and I eat the cost.

You aren't going to have that option. It's going to be tough to absorb a percentage of 'lost causes' with the gross cost of this product. Now, consider that what you're selling is perhaps 50 times more complicated than the stuff I sell, and I can foresee some forehead slaps in your future.

Obviously, there are outfits that manage to sell electrical parts to the general public, and I hope you succeed too; I'm just suggesting that it would be a mistake to underestimate how unbelievably obtuse and unmotivated some of your buyers are going to be.

You'll need some iron-clad return policies, but like I said -- they're not going to read them, either.
I agree , I think you are on a good path with this product But I wouldn't want to be you selling an electrical part to the open public.;)
 
I agree , I think you are on a good path with this product But I wouldn't want to be you selling an electrical part to the open public.;)

Point noted :),

The complexity of installation should be on par in terms of complexity with doing a coil relay mod but at the same time provide much more. It is certainly less involved than a complete system relay mod or for that matter complete harness rebuilds.

If there is anything that seems complicated or unclear about the functionality let me know. To me the drawing is very clear as it is to another engineer that I have reviewing the design right now. Of course as history will tell, hat doesn't mean the bulk of the members will understand :rolleyes: .
 
Knowing all the electrical discussions you have had on this site, doing this seems to be a logical path for you. This is a pretty neat product and will keep my relays I bought a month ago sitting on the shelf in wait for the availability of this unit. If you send out a PM when it's available, put me on the list.

I've laid out thousands of feet of wire during my lifetime in hot rods, vehicle test instrumentation, and god knows what else. Also spend a lot of time in forums helping people with electrical issues and modifications. And while not as bad as some, tend to glance through instructions. Some of Robert's warnings ring true with my experience in dealing with some people in the auto forums as well, although that should not dampen this project.
 
Knowing all the electrical discussions you have had on this site, doing this seems to be a logical path for you. This is a pretty neat product and will keep my relays I bought a month ago sitting on the shelf in wait for the availability of this unit. If you send out a PM when it's available, put me on the list.

I've laid out thousands of feet of wire during my lifetime in hot rods, vehicle test instrumentation, and god knows what else. Also spend a lot of time in forums helping people with electrical issues and modifications. And while not as bad as some, tend to glance through instructions. Some of Robert's warnings ring true with my experience in dealing with some people in the auto
forums as well, although that should not dampen this project.

I was just reading this thread and I have to LOL;), I'm starting to think that the plumbing analogy for electrical circuits has probably done more to undermine the common man's understanding, care and handling of electricity than anything else. :rolleyes:

http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showpost.php?p=1902294&postcount=14

Yes after being here on this website for about the last 5 years, I have become exposed to all kinds of "bad practices" that I could really not have imagined considering my aerospace background. :-&

What sets this product apart from other approaches using multi-purpose fuse boxes is that it will be specialized to an application with specific directions for a GS Suzuki. Suzuki did a pretty darn good job of maintaining consistency in at least the wire color coding of various GS circuits so that is a significant enabler for GS version of this product. I have looked at the GSXR's with alternators and I thing with small variation the SSPB will work there as well. I plan to explore other other bike models (Honda, Kawasaki) as well, but I'm clearly more experienced with the GS line so that is where I'm focusing at the moment.

Invariably those directions won't be clear, or won't be read and the SSPB won't work as intended. The premise is that we can't expect an installer to necessarily understand all the connections, but they do need to follow the directions. But as just stated, they wont!!! Even though it is in male DNA to only read directions when all else fails, ultimately the directions are going to be easier to follow than to make everybody comprehend how it all works and properly execute and custom install. At some point if you don't understand the theory and you wont follow directions and you cant get help then it won't work.

I accept this realization and that I can not design around this situation. My objective is to avoid having that person burn up their bike no matter what they do (at least due to a mis-connected SSPB). Having gone through a fault analysis I think this can be achieved, although there are probably some more things that I have not though of.:o

In some respects, as a product I liken the SSPB to the motorcycle decals products. In the hands of a professional or at least a proficient installer the results will be as desired. However there are plenty of ways to screw up the install including what you do with the paint gun. In the case of a decal, you pretty much have to start over if you over spray with clear and lift the decal. With the SSPB you can keep trying until you get it right and the warning will tell you when you have something wrong. A decal is even a lower value item, so comparatively, as a product, the SSPB is significantly better.

As far as the SSPB in comparison to other electrical components, it is on par with a coil relay modification coupled with an R/R install. However, to my mind the typical coil relay mods (for the average person) are overly complicated and very confusing because there are so many sets of directions that have be posted. In that regard there will only be one set of directions for the SSBP (at least for one application).

There is the issue or requiring an acceptable if not proper technique for crimping and soldering the connector /harness contacts. Go back to the decal example, you have to have a certain level of expertise and aptitude. If you cant crimp and solder a wire, you probably should not install this yourself. This is not necessarily bad as it also opens an opportunity for an network of "installers".

As far as the SSPB R/R to Battery connections, they are simpler than current "standard practice". I know most people directly wire R/R's to batteries and then put in excessively large fuses to compensate for what I at least consider mis-wiring. Of course my preferred solution has the down side of using the original fuse box but that is also why the SSPB is designed as it is to make that issue go away.

A design objective is that the SSPB can't fry a harness because it was mis-connected so that is also a given. The only solution here is that the "installer" will have to keep trying until they get all the connections correct. I guess this is where the warning and buzzer come in as at least it will tell you if it is happy with the connections.

Thanks for the comments and the support.:)
 
The design of the SSPB minimizes the exposure of unprotected power and thereby minimizes the risk of any inadvertent short circuit by a "club handed" motorcycle mechanic.

The plot below was taken from my breadboard SSPB. The entire GS1100ESD motorcycle electrical system was running off of the solid state device and I touched the SW ACC power wire (a 10 Amp capacity circuit) directly to the frame causing a short.

The plots are 5 amps per division for the yellow AMPS trace and 5 volts per vision for the turquoise VOLTS. Realize that the plot is repeating itself several times per second as the SSPB does a thermal reset. But on each re-attempt to distribute power in the presence of a short this is what happens.

The plot shows the voltage with the bike at a slow idle just under 12V. With a short applied the SSPB goes through repeated attempts to apply current to the shorted circuit. After the initial current surge from the short (to 17 amps), there is a current limit to about 12 amps that only last for 1/4 of a mill-sec (1/4 of 1/1000 of a sec) and then a thermal limit hits which causes the SSPB to completely open the circuit. This is the protection for one individual 10 amp circuit. The SSPB will have 5 independent circuits protected this way, each having a 10 amp capacity but overall limited to 20 amps all together (by a separate internal solid state fuse, limits to the charging system itself and another inline 15 amp fuse to the battery).

This process repeats itself several times per second. While this is going on there is not outward sign of an issue the bike just kept running at the slow idle. This is why the LED and warning buzzer are needed. Without them I would not even know that there was a direct short. I could remove the wire from the frame and connected it to a light and the light comes on. Remove the wire from the light and short out to the frame and the warning comes on.That is what I call safe power.

The voltage dropped while current is being supplied but it only dropped by about 1 volt.

I'm sure you will agree this is pretty impressive. All power from the SSPB is protected in one of the 5 circuits which is anything connected to the 10 pin connector.

If this had been an ignition circuit short, it would have been easy to diagnose because as soon as you turn on your kill switch the buzzer will come on and the bike will not fire.

If it is the signal circuit, then no brake lights or blinkers and the buzzer is on.

If it is the HEADLAMP circuit same thing.

DirectShort_zps54359e75.jpg
 
Last edited:
..... There is the issue or requiring an acceptable if not proper technique for crimping and soldering the connector /harness contacts. Go back to the decal example, you have to have a certain level of expertise and aptitude. If you cant crimp and solder a wire, you probably should not install this yourself. This is not necessarily bad as it also opens an opportunity for an network of "installers"........

I had a third paragraph in my post that I deleted, but I'll add it now.

I was asked by PM in another forum if I would help an owner install under frame door lights (puddle lights) in his F250 like I did on my truck. He proclaimed he had good electrical and mechanical knowledge, but I should have known better when he asked me what crimper he should buy.

After the discussion and links to my pictorials he could not get them to work. We went over and over about the connections, a simple setup with a relay, fused power and trigger off the interior lights. When he finally sent me pictures everything was laid out fine, shrink wrapped at the terminals and bundled well. Then I noticed the terminals looked a little larger then expected.

He needed larger terminals then I spec'd as he crimped right over the insulation, never exposing the hard wire to the make contact with the terminals. He went back and bought the larger terminals when he could not get the correctly sized ones I mentioned over the insulation. Amazing since my pictorial showed crimped and soldered wire, which he just ignored. Sometimes the horse just won't drink.

You'll be fine as long as your don't ask for wire and 6 ton crimpers like this. It's a solid connection though ....

DSCF0454.jpg



DSCF0452.jpg
 
OK Guys I have an update on the SSPB. The good news is that I finally got the PCB files shipped off today. It took me much longer than I had anticipated as I basically ended up adopting the ISO 7637-1:1990 standards for the design of the SSPB. As it turns out the automotive environment has some nasty energy pulses which can occur are various times; things like:

  • Ignition spark
  • Hooking up to a car with a charging alternator.
  • Hooking up to a battery charger with a low battery.
  • Disconnecting from a car with a charging alternator
  • Removing a battery from a charging motor cycle.
  • Connecting to a trickle charger when on.
    etc:

So what the ISO 7637-1:1990 standard does is to lay out pulsed energy characteristics for various conducted disturbances (this means coming on a wire v.s. radiated emissions) . It further lays out design and test guidelines for standardization of product performance specifications. There are really no requirements per se, but it provides some pretty specific guidelines for characterization of your design.

So what that basically means is that in the design of the SSPB I have had to try and deal with energy pulses that can exceed +/- 100 volts!!! :eek: The ability to do this depends on several factors the most important of which is how much impedance there is from the source of the conducted emissions as well as the duration. If you want to do any reading on this look up "Load Dump". It can be pretty horrendous. I ended up putting maximum (given space constraints) protection on all the inputs and outputs of the SSPB.

I was also fortunate enough to have a buddy that basically designed the military equivalent of the SSPB while working at Delco. He reviewed the design last week giving me the thumbs up.

My expectation is that for any source on a GS, the SSPB will survive unphased. It will even survive some pretty ugly stuff coming from a charging automobile; much more than most all of your other devices can stand. Properly installed, the SSPB should even protect the rest of your bikes electronics if you should happen to do something foolish like jump your bike from a running automobile.

Here are some pictures of my mock up comparing the SSPB to a stock GS1100ED fuse box. I don't have the primary wires coming into the side or show the two LED's but it does have the lower 10 pin correction and it fits on the bottom. There will be an low cost option to do dash mounted LED's if you wish; LED and harness only you need to find something to drill a hole into for mounting. Otherwise the LED's will be mounted in the box with the internal buzzer.

You can also see the 0.190" aluminum mounting plate. The unit will be fully epoxy sealed from below so you should be able to run this thing submerged.:D

The physical size of the Unit is:
1.8" Wide excluding the mounting tabs which are an extra 0.5" each side.
4.1" Long excluding the connector which protrudes about 0.6" from below.
1.5" Height including the aluminum mounting plate.

001_zpsa76c1e00.jpg



002_zps7e93f278.jpg



005_zpsa578eca4.jpg


The heatsink is only 0.190" think and should be the same foot print as your OEM fuse box. The heatsink is the silver thing on the left. It should be mounted to the side plate in the stock location. With enough air flow it could be free floating. I expect power dissipation to only be 5W about 1/10 of a shunt R/R.

006_zps4c53a093.jpg


Hoping to get the bare PCBA's within two weeks and will be ordering more parts as the design has changed since my first orders. I will assemble and test the initial batch before epoxy filling the units that go out. Depending on how things go these could be ready in about 1 month from now.

So I'm looking for interest to buy the first prototypes as well as which style of base ( diagonal like the later fuse boxes or symmetrical like the older 8V models.).

I'm going to provide these first units with a simple box shown without graphics. If everything works out and there is enough interest in producing these in higher quantities I will have the box produced with professional graphics. I can swap out those new covers to any of the original buyers.

So for now I'll stick to my original $150 for these first prototypes

Offering a warranty is a bit of an unknown on something like this, but I'll offer a full repair or replace warranty for 3 years.

Let me know who is going to want one, I'm going to be getting the Alum. plates made pretty soon.

This is basically what you will see when you open the cover. Most of the parts and circuitry are on the back side buried in epoxy.

SSPB_Back_zps13e9bd0c.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm in. Older 8V style mount. Graphics? I don't need no stinking graphics. I'll find some way to scrape up the money.
 
Back
Top