• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

1981 GSX1100 Katana Based Project

There may not be any big ticket items left to modify or delete to save weight however, there is always something that can be worked on. This week it is the seat pad.

This is the first version for the seat pad and although light it could be lighter.

Seatpad1 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


The second version, 103 grams lighter.

Seatpad2 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


The lighter seat pad installed.

Seatpad3jpg by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Seatpad4 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Running tally = 182,956 grams.
 
Rob S. said:
With you on? :livid:
Click to expand...

Not yet!

The running tally numbers are for dry weight which is fine however, there is no fun with no fuel!

After test rides to check fuel consumption it works out that 13 litres of fuel gives a range of 219.375 km. Using those numbers I can reduce the fuel load from a full tank of 21 litres down to 13 litres and still have enough fuel to have fun for a few hours.

So why do these fuel numbers matter for the project? Less fuel is less weight as well as lowering the centre of gravity and both of those are a good thing to make for fun riding.

The take away from the reduced fuel load is knowing how much fuel I need for a total riding (curb) weight for the Kat and not carry extra fuel that isn't needed.

So as of today the riding total weight of the Kat (without me aboard) is:

199.864 kg

Riding a sub 200 kg 1981 Katana fitted with an EF 1135 engine has transformed my riding experience to a level of enjoyment I didn't fully understand could be possible at the start of this project! The result so far is beyond all my expectations and although this has been a long, expensive and at times a very trying build to find solutions to reducing the weight I can say, hand on heart it has been worth the effort, no doubt what so ever!

I believe there are still some areas that can be modified to reduce the weight further so there will be updates in the future. I am still thinking about installing the Mikuni 38mm flat slide carbs but that is a job for another day.
 
Last edited:
No one has offered an opinion on this, but this may be right up your alley. My '82 11E doesn't have a center stand, so that's good for weight savings. But, if it did have one might not the center of gravity be lower?

Not a huge difference either way, but as someone who's weighing every tenth of a gram, I thought you might have an opinion. I think it's better off without the center stand, as the lowering of C. of G. with it, if any, would be imperceptible.
 
Rob S. said:
No one has offered an opinion on this, but this may be right up your alley. My '82 11E doesn't have a center stand, so that's good for weight savings. But, if it did have one might not the center of gravity be lower?

Not a huge difference either way, but as someone who's weighing every tenth of a gram, I thought you might have an opinion. I think it's better off without the center stand, as the lowering of C. of G. with it, if any, would be imperceptible.
Click to expand...

I don't know the weight of an 11E centre stand but a Kat centre stand with bolts, bushes and spring is 2,330 grams so the centre stand is long gone from the build. The centre stand is the lowest bit of hardware (not including wheels) so its effect on the C of G would be minimal compared to having that weight up around the bars, clocks and fuel. Someone here may have the correct answer to the stands effect on C of G but it isn't me.
 
Took the Kat out today to test the modified (lighter) seat pad for a two hour ride and so far so good. The new seat pad is smaller in area and 26mm thinner and has lowered the riding position. Although the seat pad is thinner the ride was very comfortable and in fact is more comfortable compared to the previous seat pad with the higher sitting position. I didn't think lowering the sitting position by 26 mm would make such a difference to improving comfort as well as improving handling with the change to the riding position. In this case changing the ride to suit the rider has turned out well even if the reason for the change was to reduce weight with no consideration for improved comfort and handling.
 
Last edited:
Now that the Project is a going concern and is performing well, there is now time for some tweeking to shed some grams here and there when any excess weight is identified. There is no bar buzz being generated throughout the rev range so the bar end-weights can go as well as cutting 20mm off the clip-ons to lighten the bars. My guess is around 140-160 grams will bite the dust, will know the answer this weekend after surgery.
 
Next thing to go on a diet will be the mirrors. Right now the Kat is fitted with genuine Suzi mirrors and being genuine they are a quality part however, that quality includes weight. I found a set of used Barrac mirrors with aluminium stems, compared to the OEM steel stem these should be lighter than what I have now, fingers crossed. Barrac also make these in carbon, lighter but expensive!

The mirrors should arrive in a few weeks with the rest of my parts order.

Barrac Mirrors 1 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
While I am waiting for the mirrors to arrive and see what they weigh, hopefully less than OEM mirrors, I had time to fit the volt meter today. Made the bracket last week and left it over the weekend
for the paint to cure. Adding weight is the opposite to what this build is about however, my electrical adviser strongly suggested that a volt meter is a must have to monitor a lithium battery. In our riding group several lithium batteries have failed with three of them popping the cases and luckily not catching fire. The cause was over-charging and the bikes did not have volt meters fitted so the owners had no way of knowing there was a problem until there was a problem. Found a light weight volt meter that fits under the engine temp gauge and doesn't look too over the top on a vintage Kat. The running tally is jumping up a few grams today.

volt meter 4 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


volt meter bracket 3 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


volt meter 5 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr

Running tally = 199.800 kg.
 
The mirrors arrived today, 773 grams total for the pair. I was hoping they would be lighter having aluminium stems so this will take a bit of work to make them lighter. If I can get them down to 600 grams that will be just over 30% lighter than the OEM mirrors so that means taking 87 grams off each mirror. Not keen on drilling holes in the stem so it will be changing the profile of the stems to lighten them.

Mirrors before mods.
Mirrors 1 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Update on the mirrors, the stems are cast aluminium and not forged aluminium so drilling or thinning down the stems may weaken them. For now the mirrors will stay as supplied and not be modified however, because they are wider than "Old School" Suzi Kat mirrors I can now see in the mirrors without "Katana Elbow" so that's an improvement and the new mirrors look sporty so two wins.

To align the right mirror with the left mirror I had to make a bracket to position the mirror forward of the mirror mount on the bar.
Mirror 5 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Mirror 6jpg by Max Mutarn, on Flickr
 
The muffler that had been used for the build decided it didn't want to be on the Team and threw in the towel, the titanium inlet parted company with the can flange. I found a pretty decent used carbon and stainless muffler to replace the damaged titanium unit and installed it today. Sounds good and looks good so all is good!


muffler b1 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Muffler b2 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Muffler b3 by Max Mutarn, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
I scored some used carbon parts on the weekend so a few more grams to be shed once they are installed. Also having a set of machined aluminium mirror mounts made to replace the current set that just look wrong as well as being heavier than they need to be. Pics of carbon parts and mirror mounts will be posted here when they arrive.
 
The super light weight chain guard was supplied with a titanium allen bolt and aluminium spacer. The spacer is needed to off-set the guard position as the 520 rear sprocket is installed 8mm closer to the wheel than the stock carrier due to using a lighter sprocket carrier.

Carbon guard hardware a by Max Mutarn, on Flickr
 
As I have mentioned before in this build the low hanging fruit has been picked bare so from now on it will be fine tuning of parts to reduce weight, a few grams here and a few grams there. Today I revisited the mirror mounts and swapped them for thinner wall aluminium mounts, every gram taken off is a win.


Mirror mount a by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Mirror mount b by Max Mutarn, on Flickr


Mirror mount c by Max Mutarn, on Flickr

Running Tally = 199.677 kg.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top